What are the theories?
I would argue simply based on the IFR that it was no different to any other "virus", if such a thing exists that they cannot find.
When examining the data based on all cause mortality, the excess deaths as Prof Denis Rancourt has shown have no evidence of a plague, but likely signature of mass homicide by government response.
The early Gov response by preventing the sick people to seek medical care for other ailments has added to the misclassification or diagnosis by the PCR and how the deaths were attributed falsely due to this test. The refusal to investigate by means of post mortem is indicative of a deliberate plan to inflate the number to instill fear and force people to seek salvation.
The salvation proposed was an injection of an unproven concoction (a witches brew) of toxins to kill the demon/phantom.
His further research examining the same if different location shows that the toxic chemical campaigns can clearly be attributed to the excess deaths.
This campaign is nothing other than a Government mass genocide and deliberate decimation of the populous. A war on the people by a conniving Government with the Eugenicists who offered huge payment for this to health officials aligned to the WHO. Well that's my opinion.
I have huge pity for those who fell for this hoax and scandalous campaign of fear and hope that the Almighty will deal with these terrible purveyors of death as its clear the Government will do nothing.
So next is we have to get rid of these fiends who reside in our parliaments.
"It is impossible that a virus with an infection fatality rate on par with other endemic viruses should cause significant and regional spikes in deaths as happened in early 2020."
Well actually it IS possible.
If, as biologist J J Couey asserts, cDNA infectious clones were used to 'seed' the pandemic in select locations, then this is EXACTLY what you'd expect to see. Significant spikes of unusually short duration, where the lethality rapidly attenuates (due to CoVs' high mutagenicity and tendency to devolve to the largely benign), leading to an overall IFR of less than 1%.
Couey's observation seems to be studiously ignored by so many in this debate, yet his logic is compelling. CoVs (and any other RNA virus) simply DO NOT HAVE THE REPLICATION FIDELITY TO DRIVE A GLOBAL PANDEMIC. Hence the massive government PR campaign of fearmongering, the fraudulent tests guaranteed to yield high rates of false positives (or just positive for any CoVs), the unusual and harmful treatment protocols, the massive overinflation of deaths attributed to the virus ... This pig was never going to fly because pigs just don't have wings.
Which means the only mechanism likely to account for such unusually high levels of excess mortality has to be interventions capable of impacting physiology on a deep and systemic level.
Be nice if you sent this to Toby to see if he would print it.
Edit: thanks for pointing out the error in the figures. It has been updated.
A useful summary!
"The reality is that Covid cases and deaths have varied so dramatically across regional, state, and country borders as to perplex even the best epidemiologist. Did Covid know where these borders were and change its infectivity and lethality for the occasion?". Clearly, different rules and procedures were a major contribution to confounding the data. As your subsequent paragraphs show, the WHO was evidently complicit in this.
Here in Scotland you were deemed to have died from Covid if you'd had a +positive PCR test up to 28 days before. Yes, being run over by a bus counted. Mass psychosis is a terrible thing.
Regarding the Massachusetts store workers.
Is Mr Verduyn's 0.05% figure wrong?
24% of the initial 20% of positive workers, roughly equals 5% not 0.05%.
It's exhausting how we not only have the authorities around the world telling us that millions died of SARS-Cov-2 but all the interventions saved millions plus the novel vaccines are safe and effective and also saved millions but now we also have people who have been opposed to the nonsense now arguing amongst themselves about how many angels are on the pinhead. It seems to me that most of the people who died over the last few years were likely to die anyway because they were very old/already sick with life-threatening illnesses. The others died because everyone who should have known better panicked and mistreated people who needed care. I would say the excess deaths were mostly caused by the neglect rather than the virus. Although, once the jabs started rolling out and the dead started being younger, I think the cause of excess deaths moved.
I do not make Rancourt's assertions my own. But I do want to defend his perspective somewhat: Unlike Jones, Rancourt does provide reasons to attribute excess mortality to COVID inoculations. Most particularly, that excess mortality can be seen to rise and sink in (slightly lagging) unison with doses administered (and in many places only then) and that beginning with the summer season of 2021, no very plausible alternatives have been suggested for widespread excess mortality except for diminished standard of living and increased stress, both of which he has discussed in his work.
The clues will be in the ICD10 codes assigned to deaths. Worldwide, insurance companies are seeing huge increases in cardiac and cancer related deaths and this is born out by personal experience.
These increases are due to virus/vaccination/delayed treatment/stress/neglect and the ratio of these will take careful sleuthing to unravel. It is not helpful for global Departments of Health to sweep it under the rug and blame all the excess on the virus. They are complicit with their fear mongering, coercive, one size fits all response to the "pandemic".
My ex m-i-l, 81 yrs, taken to hospital after fall out of bed for check up as she had slight abdominal pain. She also had moderate dementia too. They found hairline crack on pelvic area and said she would require surgery. Apart from this discomfort, she had no other symptoms. She was laughing and joking with my son who accompanied her to hospital. This was April 2022. Before being admitted as in-patient, they tested her and it was positive. Son sent away and no visitors for ten days. When family allowed in, she looked dishevelled, unwashed and heavily drugged. When she was prodded and talked to, she complained of thirst and hunger. She went on to develop pneumonia. Family got her out to a hospice where she died a few days later. I used to wonder, when reading obituaries many years ago, how people died of pneumonia (thinking it was something you got from the cold), when they went in with something else! So, yes it happens but her death cert had covid on it which she didn't have. Hospital protocols, no visitors, no ortho physiotherapy, too many or wrong drugs, missed drinks and meals due to drugs, all contributed to her death. She was at least double jabbed, maybe 3 x. Fall could have resulted from jabs. Many factors involved. As John Rappoport says, everyone is looking for the one thing, alleged virus, as the cause when there are always multiple factors, never a virus.
Why would anyone go to such lengths to deny that there is another cause for excess deaths when he clearly couldn’t provide any evidence in support of his claim. One has to ask what his motivation was?
Statistics combined with the growing clinical knowledge of the mechanisms by which the COVID vaxxxes can damage the human body point to the vaxxes as the primary cause of excess mortality, excess disability and excess absence from work.
I only agree with Will Jones on one front: this virus existed/exists, and was/is "special". I base this solely on my own personal experience of it in January 2020. It was a flu unlike any I have experienced in my 7 decades, an all-embracing dose that included too many symptoms simultaneously to be "normal" flu.
Hi, thanks for the article. Original article seems to have an error. You may need to correct the numbers in this line to: "And if Covid was so special, why were only 5% (20%×24%) of employees actually sick?"
My sense us that the entire caboodle complete with lasting collateral damage,has led to excess deaths: lockdowns,npis,vaccine related morbidity ,despair ,missed cancer diagnoses,cardiovascular events-both vaccine induced and otherwise -deaths caused by alcoholism , drug misuse ,obesity and diabetic complications,child abuse,isolation
The consequences of this disastrous event will be with us for a very long time and now that the likelihood of epigenetic effects is taken into account,it is possibke that future generations will also bear the scars
My money is on (1) vaccinations and (2) non pharmaceutical interventions. That is, Covid policies caused more excess deaths than Covid.