Thanks for the excellent and thoughtful treatment of a very difficult and divisive subject. I had not heard of this WHO guideline before, but I'm not surprised. As with their COVID guidance, this WHO posture is not sustainable.
In the end, I think their pursuit of total control is going to make them lose it all... When something is worse than useless, reality will ultimately have its way.
baby vs. pregnancy tissue based on location is quite the framing. not to be too crass, but it would seem to me then that the act of creating the pregnancy would include transforming a penis into procreation tissue.
Dr David Bell has written an outstanding piece in this assessment of the WHO's so called "guidelines". As the good doctor has stated, abortion is a difficult topic when it comes to morality and ethics and so it should be. Likewise, any decision to abort an unborn baby in the making (read "human being") should be difficult.
All aspects of the decision making process require extensive checks and balances, to wit; there must be input from multiple parties. I would go further but there is a balance to be struck. If there are too many barriers to accessing a legitimate (whatever that means) termination, the back street abortionist will see a huge uptick in "trade".
It is not for the WHO to play fast and loose with millennia of human understanding. We all instinctively and culturally know what it means to be alive. Without effort and training the youngest of toddlers can distinguish between an inanimate object such as a brick and an animate entity, such as an ant. If something can move, if it can grow, then at the very basic level of understanding of an infant, it must be alive. The majority of adults know this too.
The WHO is an evil entity, funded by similarly evil persons.
Criminals, no other way to describe this. And the (pseudo atii life )women screaming for this are the fascist disciples of their sect. These women are not God's creatures. Mot even an amimal thinks this way, female animals ocassionaly eat their off-spring but these women have selfish reasons not to take normal contraceptives and the pill... brutish, compassionless why don't they consider to remove their wombs perhaps... we have develop a selfish society who are pushed to be selfish for reasons of greed through pharma and their affiliates...
I have met former abortionists who have described their former lives as business ventures--that was it. It was money. Clearly this would not be every case, but it is good business apparently.
As a person with little compassion or empathy towards others, my intent to murder someone would not be malicious--I'd just not want them to exist for personal reasons. I think I see the pro abortion argument clearly: some of those who support it seem to think the same way I do and rely on the fear and emotionalism of others to bolster their belief. The difference for me is that I fear (for lack of a better word) the consequences both here and after I'm dead. Even legalizing murder would not protect me from my belief in the afterlife and the punishments therein. As a country boy observing nature as a child life seemed to either be "on" or "off". The rest is just sophistry. I am a little amused that "good" people around me find life so trite and disposable while I try to find reasons to respect it.
Same here.. pharma politics are based around making money and finding ways to do it.. it is extremely sad to me, this death squad pushed by who.. what happened to respect ro life and reaponsibility. Taking life away of any baby after 3 months at the least, is murder. This whole thing is created to divide the Christians from the non Christians and not so sincere Christians. Bad versus pure evil. I saw and advert on a london bus saying "since there is no god anyway, why don't you enjoy life". Is that jerk with the big ears who had to wait 74 years to get a real job cutting lints not suppose to protect the Christian Church? And he is the leading figure in all of this... hiding behind his ears
It seems that every slogan conceived by these people has problems: Belief in God = not loving life whereas atheist = loving life? There cannot be belief in God and loving/appreciating/respecting life? And there cannot be a disbelief in God and being depressed? Bullocks. Respecting life is the whole supposed premise of the Christian worldview if you do it right. As you say, all they need is to create division and suspicion of the other tribe and they're done.
Sorry mistake, one drawback of substack reply section is you have to type all over, cannot copy, paste or edit. There will come a time when who stasi police will come and stop all free platforms, because they can.
Yes. And then they call their baphomet transgendered actionfigure looking kind of god benevolent.... how strange that all of a sudden in 3 years time they have rheir own alphabet, their own set of words and deformities thereof, same as their deformed transgendered, mutelated victim children. These big pharma criminals are deforming life and science to fit their ever growing bulging pockets. There is no respect for nature and life anymore and no human decency to match it. And there will come a time when their big WHO stasi stormtruppen will even take platforms like substack down, ao that there will be no free words ever been spoken again. Force is the only language they know, when manupilation doesn't do the job fast enough. For ever using fear and guilt as the forerunners.
Thanks for the excellent and thoughtful treatment of a very difficult and divisive subject. I had not heard of this WHO guideline before, but I'm not surprised. As with their COVID guidance, this WHO posture is not sustainable.
In the end, I think their pursuit of total control is going to make them lose it all... When something is worse than useless, reality will ultimately have its way.
baby vs. pregnancy tissue based on location is quite the framing. not to be too crass, but it would seem to me then that the act of creating the pregnancy would include transforming a penis into procreation tissue.
Dr David Bell has written an outstanding piece in this assessment of the WHO's so called "guidelines". As the good doctor has stated, abortion is a difficult topic when it comes to morality and ethics and so it should be. Likewise, any decision to abort an unborn baby in the making (read "human being") should be difficult.
All aspects of the decision making process require extensive checks and balances, to wit; there must be input from multiple parties. I would go further but there is a balance to be struck. If there are too many barriers to accessing a legitimate (whatever that means) termination, the back street abortionist will see a huge uptick in "trade".
It is not for the WHO to play fast and loose with millennia of human understanding. We all instinctively and culturally know what it means to be alive. Without effort and training the youngest of toddlers can distinguish between an inanimate object such as a brick and an animate entity, such as an ant. If something can move, if it can grow, then at the very basic level of understanding of an infant, it must be alive. The majority of adults know this too.
The WHO is an evil entity, funded by similarly evil persons.
Thank you for this very thoughtful and thought provoking essay on a difficult subject. I find the WHO position terrifying.
Thanks Panda for exposing these $atanic evils.
Off topic somewhat , you may also find this interesting.
WEF Bans Natural Conception: All Babies Must Be Lab-Grown by 2030
https://rumble.com/v2svk5u-wef-bans-natural-conception-all-babies-must-be-lab-grown-by-2030.html
Criminals, no other way to describe this. And the (pseudo atii life )women screaming for this are the fascist disciples of their sect. These women are not God's creatures. Mot even an amimal thinks this way, female animals ocassionaly eat their off-spring but these women have selfish reasons not to take normal contraceptives and the pill... brutish, compassionless why don't they consider to remove their wombs perhaps... we have develop a selfish society who are pushed to be selfish for reasons of greed through pharma and their affiliates...
This has nothing to do with women screaming for it, but this is yet again the globalist agenda of 1) Depopulation and 2) organ harvesting.
"Criminals" is too good a word for them - these globalist parasites are evil, satanic, psychopathic scum; who unfortunately have a God complex.
I have met former abortionists who have described their former lives as business ventures--that was it. It was money. Clearly this would not be every case, but it is good business apparently.
There is money to be made with live abortions, organs etc and vaccines are filled as well.
As a person with little compassion or empathy towards others, my intent to murder someone would not be malicious--I'd just not want them to exist for personal reasons. I think I see the pro abortion argument clearly: some of those who support it seem to think the same way I do and rely on the fear and emotionalism of others to bolster their belief. The difference for me is that I fear (for lack of a better word) the consequences both here and after I'm dead. Even legalizing murder would not protect me from my belief in the afterlife and the punishments therein. As a country boy observing nature as a child life seemed to either be "on" or "off". The rest is just sophistry. I am a little amused that "good" people around me find life so trite and disposable while I try to find reasons to respect it.
Same here.. pharma politics are based around making money and finding ways to do it.. it is extremely sad to me, this death squad pushed by who.. what happened to respect ro life and reaponsibility. Taking life away of any baby after 3 months at the least, is murder. This whole thing is created to divide the Christians from the non Christians and not so sincere Christians. Bad versus pure evil. I saw and advert on a london bus saying "since there is no god anyway, why don't you enjoy life". Is that jerk with the big ears who had to wait 74 years to get a real job cutting lints not suppose to protect the Christian Church? And he is the leading figure in all of this... hiding behind his ears
It seems that every slogan conceived by these people has problems: Belief in God = not loving life whereas atheist = loving life? There cannot be belief in God and loving/appreciating/respecting life? And there cannot be a disbelief in God and being depressed? Bullocks. Respecting life is the whole supposed premise of the Christian worldview if you do it right. As you say, all they need is to create division and suspicion of the other tribe and they're done.
Sorry mistake, one drawback of substack reply section is you have to type all over, cannot copy, paste or edit. There will come a time when who stasi police will come and stop all free platforms, because they can.
Yes. And then they call their baphomet transgendered actionfigure looking kind of god benevolent.... how strange that all of a sudden in 3 years time they have rheir own alphabet, their own set of words and deformities thereof, same as their deformed transgendered, mutelated victim children. These big pharma criminals are deforming life and science to fit their ever growing bulging pockets. There is no respect for nature and life anymore and no human decency to match it. And there will come a time when their big WHO stasi stormtruppen will even take platforms like substack down, ao that there will be no free words ever been spoken again. Force is the only language they know, when manupilation doesn't do the job fast enough. For ever using fear and guilt as the forerunners.