WHO is afraid of getting a flu or a cold? Is the question we need to be asking ourselves.

Medicine and science and health education has become a non-science.

Malfeasant intent is obvious.

Thomas you may be interested in reading my articles.

What causes a cold or respiratory dis-ease?

The establishment’s model of blood and lung physiology FAILS under scrutiny. I’ll explain why.

We breathe air not oxygen.

Air is measured by its moisture or humidity Eg its at 45% humidity today

Oxygen is measured by its dryness Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million or less of water contamination.

The lung alveoli requires air reaching it to be at 100% humidity, that is dew point.

Can you comprehend the mis-match?

Oxygen is manufactured by stripping air of moisture. Oxygen is a product of air NOT a constituent of air.

There is no wild/natural oxygen in air. Oxygen becomes nitrogen with the addition of carbon particles to become a non-flammable version of oxygen. I have a link to a demonstration of this on my stack, a home oxygen concentrator is used.

The lungs are responsible for re-hydrating the red blood cells as they pass through the alveoli capillaries with salt water. The red blood cells are salt water sponges.

The saline intravenous drip rehydrates red blood cells and aids the lungs.

The insult that causes respiratory dis-stress is dehydration. It’s seasonal because cold air holds the least moisture and indoor room air often dries out with heating.

The dry mucosa must re-establish itself and the production of mucus goes into overdrive. The mucosa requires salt and moisture and it will move both from any bodily reserves. This causes pain as the extraction process goes into motion.

Now you know why the old remedies are successful.

Salt water gargles, nasal irrigations/inhalations and chicken soup / bone broth soups.

Sanatoriums were built along coastlines to take advantage of sea spray because it was known to heal injured lungs.

It is time the COMMONS reclaimed the knowledge of hydration and healing.

Hydration equals salt plus water.

Healing begins with hydration.

Oxygen’s toxicity is directly related to its power to dehydrate. Reactive oxygen species ROS describes damage due to dehydration.

Oxygen on release from a container will extract moisture from its surroundings to become air, its natural state. Oxygen released inside the respiratory tract extracts moisture from the mucosa and the delicate alveoli causing dehydration. This can kill.

Oxygen is a prescribed drug. It is primarily prescribed for the terminally ill. Palliative care is not kind.

We all need to comprehend the difference between air and oxygen. Read the material safety data sheets for oxygen and nitrogen. Both have unconsciousness and not breathing listed under inhalation.

Click on my blue icon to read article

Expand full comment

Be careful the WHO is not backing down they are using stealth for countries to go with all the crap about pandemics when the facts are not yet ratified and them when they have them by the shorts they will pounce on our freedoms with their venoms!

Expand full comment

The covid flu was pretty mild, but the treatments were quite deadly...Most of the early deaths were caused by the psychopathic treatment...WHO probably isn't interested in that....

Expand full comment

This was a comment posted in reply to Jack Poulson's own Pentagon Papers unearthed in court documents but the connections it led to have major significance for pandemic data reporting. It's reposted here along w Jack's piece. (likely timed paywall, sorry) https://jackpoulson.substack.com/p/california-based-covert-surveillance/comments


My tracking of Monsanto began in 1997 and from about 2005 Rockefeller Green Revolution & NGO fronts and frauds were transitioned to Gates Foundation so their funding always raises a red flag. No connection is without toxic fingerprints nor any shortage of plans involving dying for profits.

No surprise the crew at Premise have deep roots in places where Biotech Mafia flourish and what luck they were poised to do data reporting for Bill Gates funded WHO pandemic data, but hey Larry Summers wouldn't fudge numbers and tarnish the sterling reputation of FED Banksters!

Bloomberg - September 9, 2015

"Premise, a startup that gathers global economic data, raised $50 million in a funding round led by Valor Equity Partners.

The San Francisco-based company, whose board includes former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, works with organizations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank and Standard Chartered Bank to gather economic information in the developing world. The company expects to end 2015 with annual recurring revenue of more than $10 million.

The 40-person company plans to use the money to expand its engineering team, boost marketing and increase its capacity to collect data. Premise, which declined to disclose its valuation, had previously raised $16.5 million from the Social+Capital Partnership, Google Ventures and other investors.

The company pays people in countries such as the Philippines and Nigeria to collect information on everything from cigarette prices to personal preferences about hygiene. Premise is betting that it can efficiently gather such statistics around the world through this network of people -- currently at more than 25,000 -- who are paid to tap their findings into smartphones, creating a data set that will become more valuable as it grows." https://web.archive.org/web/20150927070950/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-24/data-gathering-startup-premise-raises-50-million-led-by-valor

September 5, 2018

Premise to empower Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with real-time data in eleven countries to support service delivery optimization.


Expand full comment

"If it takes several months for genomic sequences to be uploaded, by the time surveillance has determined anything of value, the surge, if there ever was one, will be long past."

Exactly why models are purported to reflect reality, pesky data won't ruin the story!

Expand full comment

"The crisis was man-made..." It was, but not in the way people usually think. No one rules if no one obeys. Governments and public health officials can say anything they want, but without the willing complicity, submission, and cowardice of billions of people, the plandemic would have been over in a week. Their compliance, resolute ignorance (in the Information Age), and their obvious *enjoyment* of being titillated with fear porn: That's what made the unprecedented demolition of human rights possible. The guiltiest of all are not the bureaucrats, politicians, or the parasite class at the WHO, WEF, UN, etc. The guiltiest of all are those who bowed to their sociopathic irrationality while either knowing it was irrational or refusing to learn.

As for the important lessons that escaped the WHO, don't be so sure. Mistakes of that size are not made innocently. The WHO knows damned well there was no health emergency. It knows there was no "novel coronavirus." It knows the "data" was invented. It knows the role of PCR in manufacturing the appearance of a problem. It knows about the wholesale violations of human rights it helped bring about. The social, economic, and psychological devastation and the legal precedents that will let them do it all again the next time they launch a psyop: That's not collateral damage. It was the point of the entire exercise. The lesson the WHO learned is that bullshit and propaganda *work.* It learned that 80% of the global population wants to be ruled, good and hard. It learned that morally, most of humanity hasn't yet wandered in off the savannah.

Expand full comment

Quite right, the masses were at fault and must accept responsibility for their actions. I keep trying to point out that people locked themselves down for the 'flu and even that they don’t understand isn't contagious despite what we are told.



Expand full comment
Apr 24Liked by PANDA

This is a copy of a comment that I have just posted on your article about CV19 data provided by JHU. I am posting it again here since that article was published 10 days ago.


Even though I receive emails notifying me of new articles, I receive so many Sub stack notifications that I generally do not look at them when I receive them but go through them when I have some spare time then I do some 'binge reading'. I had such a binge reading session on 15 April, prior to this article being published. I posted a comment on the 'Where Aare the Numbers' article about MHRA still not releasing data regarding pregnancies, etc. https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/mhra-still-wont-release-critical

Today I am doing a similar binge read and have just read this article about data on the JHU dashboard. Whilst reading what it said, it resonated so much with what I had said in my post on 15 April, namely:

"Bill Malcolm

Apr 15

I'm lost for words...

I have 2 points I wish to make.....

My second point is that what can be so difficult about summarising and publishing data that is contained within the systems that they administer/ monitor? It is not rocket science!

From early 2020, every country in the world (allegedly) reported, ON A DAILY BASIS, the new number of cases and deaths linked to CV19. The logistics of doing such (worldwide) reporting always puzzled me.

When did the reporting system get put in place and how was it administered? Were additional staff employed just to do this daily reporting? The logistics of this are quite mind boggling. Such data was being fielded from every health centre/ doctors practice/ hospital within each NHS region and reported centrally every day!! Even if such daily reporting was done, which I very much doubt, who (if anyone) checked/ verified the figures reported?..."

My suspicion has always been that much of the data reported in real time (news media, Covid dashboards like JHU) must have been educated estimates (guesses) or, worse still, completely made up!! This article confirms my suspicions and, if anything, it seems more likely that it was the latter!

My go-to source for CV19 data during the 'Restrictions' or 'Period of Madness' (much more apt descriptions than 'pandemic') was Worldometer, which gets prominently & extensively mentioned in your article.

As you correctly point out this website provides information (on a world wide basis) in respect of populations. What is remarkable is that this website has just 2 main topics, Population & Coronavirus


As an aside, given the date of your article, there is a note that now appears in a banner displayed (from 14 April) at the top of of the Worldometer Covid page, which says:

"NOTE: As of April 13, 2024, the Coronavirus Tracker is no longer being updated..."

What is peculiar (gleaned from using the Wayback Machine) is that prior to 2019, the site only had one tab on its home page (Population). In May 2019, it added a "GDP" tab and in September it added a "CO2" tab. The peculiar thing about the CO2 tab is that it only shows data from 1971 up to 2016. The tables & graphs in the tab look like a test out of the tables & graphs that would used in the (still in the future) Coronavirus tab.

On 29 January 2020, the Coronavirus tab was added.


Whoever did this must have had amazing forethought (like 'Mystic Meg'!!) to decide to set up a completely new section on the website, which according to the figures it reported that day, only had deaths (1,133) in one single country (China). The table this day has 20 countries listed. The other 19 countries, in aggregate, have zero deaths and only 101 cases (range 1 to 14), including USA with just 5 cases.

On this first day of Coronavirus reporting, Worldometer ditch their GDP tab. And the next day (30 Jan), Worldometer ditches its CO2 tab!!

Another remarkable thing about 30 January is that 963 previously dead people in China came back to life because the total deaths for China dropped from 1,133 to only 170!!!

Prior to 29 January 2020, The Worldometer website would not have required much administration because it was not providing real word up to date data. On the "About" page, the following is stated (December 2019) regarding how the website works:

"The live counters show the real-time estimate as computed by our proprietary algorithm, which processes the latest data and projections provided by the most reputable organizations and statistical offices in the world."

This begs the question, how did Worldometer magically have the resources to not only obtain real world live data (if it existed, which I very much doubt) from all countries around the world but also verify it on an ongoing 24 hour basis?

Below is what was stated on the About page of their website (again from December 2019):

"Trusted Authority

Worldometers was voted as one of the best free reference websites by the American Library Association (ALA), the oldest and largest library association in the world.

We have licensed our counters at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), to BBC News, and to the U2 concert, among others.

Worldometers is cited as a source in over 3500 published books, in more than 2000 professional journal articles, and in over 1000 Wikipedia pages."

I am just throwing out a hypothesis. If, prior to 2020, Worldometer was widely perceived to be such a trusted source (similar probably to how JHU would have been perceived) then, if somebody, or a group or groups, wished to spread false information/ propaganda (and wanted it to be trusted as being true) spreading such information through a trusted source (like Worldometer) would be a good way of doing it.

Particularly so because journalists and politicians are widely regarded as not trustworthy (journalists, politicians, Govt ministers are all near the bottom, around 20% trusted, in the annual Ipsos Veracity Index). Therefore a long established, very well trusted and apparently "independent" website would be excellent for providing support for what the media/ governments report, should any non-trusting citizens want to verify/ try to fact-check what they are being told.

The trustworthiness of this website seems to have even improved since December 2019 as the About page now says the following. Note the 10+fold increase in citations in journal articles (2,000 to 25,000).

"Trusted Authority

Worldometer was voted as one of the best free reference websites by the American Library Association (ALA), the oldest and largest library association in the world.

Worldometer is a provider of global COVID-19 statistics for many caring people around the world. Our data is also trusted and used by the UK Government, Johns Hopkins CSSE, the Government of Thailand, the Government of Pakistan, the Government of Sri Lanka, Government of Vietnam, Financial Times, The New York Times, Business Insider, BBC, and many others.

Over the past 15 years, our statistics have been requested by, and provided to: Oxford University Press, Wiley, Pearson, CERN, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), The Atlantic, BBC, Milton J. Rubenstein Museum of Science & Technology, Science Museum of Virginia, Morgan Stanley, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Dell, Kaspersky, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Amazon Alexa, Google Translate, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), the U2 concert, and many others.

Worldometer is cited as a source in over 10,000 published books and in more than 25,000 professional journal articles."

Expand full comment
Apr 24Liked by PANDA

Brilliant no BS summary..as usual ..!

Expand full comment

Why were countries ordering covid 19 test kits in 2017? See World International Trade website on bitchute. Just enter in bitchute search "covid WITS" - unable to attach link at this moment.

Expand full comment
Apr 24·edited Apr 25

They were not ordering test kits for a virus that had not been named/dated in 2017.

The page source was created in 2020 and not 2017

I went to the bitchute video and used the original webarchive source they showed on the page.

Then I used the wayback machine.

WHO named the virus on 11 February 2020.

The page was first scrapped on September 4th 2020.

Before(around?) September 4th 2020 someone had used the title

"COVID-19 Test kits for a retrospective analysis of 2017"

At some stage later on, the error was spotted and the title changed to

"Medical Test kits (300215) exports by country in 2017"

Which makes sense..

The bitchute page


WITS COVID-19 Test kits (300215) exports by country in 2017 listed the web archive url as the source.


When u strip out that address you get


The title has changed..now that makes sense...

Medical Test kits (300215) exports by country in 2017


When you stick that address back in the wayback machine we find the page was first scrapped Sept 4th 2020.

It's back to covid 19 test kits and at some stage later someone changed it to Medical Test kits.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that, partially answered my question as well. Although it still leaves the question, how and why were large orders for this test kit made early

Expand full comment

It answered your question.They were not ordered "early"..I showed the exact sequence of events that happened in 2020.Someone, about 8 months AFTER the WHO made an announcement and gave the virus a name, had made a typo which was then corrected later.

Expand full comment
Apr 26·edited Apr 26

ok, thanks for the links it made much better reading to be able to go back to the exports by different years

Expand full comment

Thanks for looking in to this and clarifying, much appreciated.

Expand full comment

Sars2 has not been isolated so it and Covid do not exist, as demonstrated by the excess death analyses carried out for most countries in the world. Flu and colds with a sprinkling of US manufactured bio chemical agents in hot spots.

Expand full comment

Kudos to Mr. Thomas Verduyn BASc from PANDA. Excellent research and logic.

Expand full comment


Most Doctors

Enjoy Being Proven Wrong

Far Less

Than They Tolerate Killing You.


Expand full comment

I dunno about you guys, but I really enjoyed how the corruption and murder of the western countries in the early days of the scamdemic was highlighted by their little graphs comparing the countries

Expand full comment
Apr 24Liked by PANDA

Insightful and brilliantly written! Thank you!

Expand full comment

Perhaps WHO used ChatGPT to "write" the bullet points. The GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) bullshit artist.

Expand full comment

A breath of fresh air in the foetid stink of bureaucracy and cant.

Expand full comment