I've been told by someone from Wuhan I worked with recently that the initial lockdowns there were to stop the locals destroying 5G towers to stop the spread of "the telephone disease".
As an Accident and Emergency Dept nurse of 30 years, it's not surprising people with acute respiratory symptoms, who are told to isolate for 14 days, end up presenting too late with acute respiratory failure, sepsis and multi organ failure. No surprise, the only part of acute hospitals that were struggling with capacity were critical care units.
P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine.
"Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production."
It was abundantly clear the scamdemic was front loaded. The "experts" advising CEPI/Brighton Collaboration were clueless in March 2020. By Dec 2020, some 9mo later, the entire British population was undergoing assault. QED, the means of production was already in place and rolling. WEF/BMGF/WHO will know all this in infinite, precise detail, for this is their attempt at subverting freedom, instigating corruption, and perpetrating sickness and death. It is the greatest assault ever experienced in human history. And the future still remains in uncertain balance.
This is the clearest, most articulate explanation for the "it"-hypothesis, which seems to throw other members of Team Reality into a tail spin. If I had had this concise story, I would not only could have challenged the going Narrative better, but I probably would have more friends on the Team Reality side. Thank you.
"There is no convincing evidence that the spread of any pathogen - as opposed to the spread of waves of fear, panic and medical dystopia - is directly linked to waves of fatal illnesses."
The whole thing stank of a scam by February, 2020. No one, including doctors, ever listed a single symptom of "covid" that wasn't shared with colds or the flu. Within a month of that alleged Italy outbreak I'd found articles about the 2006/2007 New England "pertussis outbreak" created by the attempted diagnostic use of PCR: 100% false positives. Those articles included the CDC's warnings about PCR, warnings that it forgot all about by 2020. By 2021 it was obvious from the total deaths per year statistics in the US that there was no pandemic: More people died in the US in 2018 than in 2020, and no one would argue that there was a pandemic in 2018.
I'm with Mike Yeadon on the existence of a novel pathogen: There wasn't one. A real pathogen is too unpredictable to be useful--and probably too tame. All the vaporing about "gain-of-function" research is a feint. Creating a furor over a lab escapee is classic misdirection to focus attention away from the fact that the DoD, NSA, and CIA were running a psyop, a false flag operation, a scam, and a rehearsed, scheduled "crisis." Scott Gottlieb, Matthew Pottinger, Deborah Birx, and now Renee DiResta are operatives. Nothing's easier to fake than a virus. Nothing's more useful for creating fear than an invisible, unknown angel of death. Nothing's more effective for making people beg to be ruled harder.
The stunning thing is that the medical "establishment" has been so completely and willingly co-opted. What it also shows is that critical thinking and ethics of the supposedly well educated left the room a long time ago. The culpable ignorance in play is a truly repulsive manifestation of evil masquerading as "bafflement."
The abject risible nonsense that is self-evident in the publication by J.Gen.Virol. in 1967, "The Morphology of Three Previously Uncharacterized Human Respiratory Viruses that Grow in Organ Culture," Almeida and Tyrrell. .... the "birth" of corona "viruses."
"A simple method is described for examining organ cultures by electron microscopy for the presence of virus particles. The method was used to detect the presence of three hitherto uncharacterized viruses. Two of these have particles resembling those of infectious bronchitis of chickens and the third morphologically resembles the parainfluenza group of viruses."
Whenever "safety" is mentioned, I ask "What type of safety data are you referring to?"
In clinical trials, safety data is comprised of lab results, procedural results, and adverse event reporting. In normal phase 2/3 studies, lab work is done prior to being given the drug and afterwards, at at many visits throughout the trial. There are also procedures like ECGs, vitals, physical exams, etc. For a simple asthma medication, we would do serial labs where we would do ECG, vitals, lots of labs, then dose the patient, then repeat all the procedures at 1 hr post dose, 4 hrs post, etc. We would do this at multiple visits. For some reason, vaccines do not follow this standard. But these mRNAs were "first in class" and should have undergone all the previously mentioned tests.
If you read the Pfizer protocol, their combined phase 2/3 only tested for immunogenicity. That was it. No other labs or ECGs or even vitals were done. How can they possibly claim "safety" when they did no tests?
The only "safety" data they used were adverse events reported during the trial and then proceeded to ignore AE reporting systems like VAERs.
It is unbelievable that no pre/post drug labs or procedures were done. They have no idea (or they do) what happens in the body after injection.
So, ask them: When you say safety data, what data are you referring to? What tests were done to show safety? Were there changes in ECGs pre and post dose? How about liver function? Cardiac enzymes? Inflammatory biomarkers? Heart rate? Blood pressure?
I remember at the time someone commenting that there should have been a massive recruitment effort for people to run the trials and process all the necessary data and there wasn't
Except in this case, there wasn't any data because they didn't run the tests. In the study protocol, which describes what the sites running the trial are supposed to do, the "Schedule of Activities" lists all the procedures that are to be done for each study subject. There were simply no labs, ECGs, etc. that were to be done. None at all so no data to process.
"Rather than asking the question “were the vaccines needed as a response to the pandemic?” we should instead be asking “was the pandemic needed for the vaccines?”.
I think your question is answered easily,
The industry is a racket that uses the Hegelian dialectic to create vast profits.
It is also clear that they (BMGF) have trapped Government into provided protection by using legal plunder and government giving this industry Blanket immunity from prosecution.
This was a BMGF created indemnity using the Swiss Gov. The vaccination alliance GAVI, founded by Bill Gates, enjoys immunity in Switzerland. Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, exposed what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance. Stuckelberger pointed out that Gates and the WHO entered into a three-way contract agreement with Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, which is highly unusual. So, essentially, when Gates did not get voted in as a one-man nation-state, he created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, essentially placing him on par with the WHO!
Locally Fahrie Hassan too has exposed BMGF influence in South African Government. It is skulduggery and he is getting away with it everywhere.
Phala-Phala is a prime example. Ramaphosa stopped the Public Protector Mkhwebane from exposing this crime so it was said in the media.
There is so much Tax-Payer money being handed out by Governments to the Vaccine Industrial Complex and they are all getting kickbacks, including the Parties like the DA.
Simple, It was a load of crock created to instil fear into gullible minds. It had nothing to do with any phantom. The Phantom was created to sell salvation. The salvation was called vaccines, it wasn't though. It was an agenda of the eugenicists who are heavily invested in the VIC and Big Pharma.
I would say something like that if my goal were to get drummed out of all family events. The immediate comeback from them to that kind of argument, is to ask:
"Yeah, so nobody died and they were all actors, right?"
They will not accept mere theories and hypotheses, these will get me lumped in with the QAnon crowd and the "the moon landing was staged" people. I'd rather have facts and data to quote to them, as these are harder to dismiss out of hand.
I just came across this long write-up https://healthfreedomdefense.org/italy-2020-inside-covids-ground-zero-was-there-really-a-pandemic/ that looks promising. To my mind, the strongest line of attack is the one that deals with how the definitions of a "Covid case" and a "Covid death" were changed in midstream, giving the impression that suddenly there was a massive new threat going around. It would be a huge project, but I wish that somebody with the means would set out to compare systematically how different definitions in different countries affected the reporting of infections and deaths.
If everyone has had a couple drinks, I would say “mass euthanasia and data fraud toward staging sudden spread of a novel coronavirus and convincing healthcare workers in other counties that something real was happening.”
If everyone is sober, go with Jonathan’s approach. :)
The waste water testing showed it In Italy as early as December 2019. ( I know from another source who was in Italy at the time, they got sick in June/July with an unusual flu like bug) More surprisingly, researchers at the University of Barcelona found traces of the virus when testing untreated wastewater samples dated March 12, 2019.
BUT once the govt decided to call it pandemic, things turned bad, It was the beginning of Winter they put all the elderly "sick" outside the hospital in tents in the cold. They closed off the area and refused to allow more Drs and others to help treat people. Normal ways of treating respiratory illnesses were ignored
Oh and when was this "virus" isolated and characterised. There was no virus. That are of Italy is heavily polluted by air pollution. Your I know "source was speculating". No researches have ever found any virus. Virology a pseudo-science, a scare story. Look for the bowtie Goblins.
I get that too. Its always the same. All other logical arguments are put aside using the same examples, Northern Italy and New York. Jonathan provided solid argumentation already. Unfortunately I never get that far with Covidians. However cautious I approach them, they just dont want an open discussion based on facts. So, if one does not form its opinion on facts, what else is left? Fear, superstition, blind trust in authorities? Way to go!
Who ever thinks they can fool the immune system plays with fire. saw the recent discussion between John Campbell and Clare Craig.
Don't you think it's weird that in arguing for a global pandemic you focus on a single area? I thought this was a global problem yet the first thing you think about is a single region? It's supposedly a globally spreading virus? Didn't it have roughly the same effects everywhere. If not, how come?
This all just illustrates how important in the narrative that particular region was.
Yet does what happened there stand up to scrutiny?
Then I would present these pieces (2nd one by yours truly):
They may well then move onto the horror of New York:. But again, it is highly anomalous. If what happened there is such an outlier why is nobody asking why? And how and why should what happened there have driven assumptions about what was happening globally?
"There never was a lethal pandemic of any pathogen which was “risk additive” to the already existing causes of respiratory infections. This is the case whether or not there was something some might regard as “novel” circulating, whether “it” came from a lab or was zoonotic in origin, and whether “it” originated in China or elsewhere."
tryBUn^Ls are long overdue. There is enough evidence and the criminals are out in the open. A core set of righteously minded individuals must be chosen and given international authority to hold these tryBUn^LS. This is not to just target people and use them as scapegoats...Nuremberg did that. Perhaps start with the implementers and drivers of this (bioweapon) as ONE of the catagories for accountability and from there filter through the system/agenda of the scam? I cannot foresee any other lasting solution.
A second question is whether the pandemic was ‘needed’ to provide an excuse for the economic debacle that was already underway. For both questions, one needs to examine the ostensible reason and then the potential real reason.
Pre Covid the economy was faltering, housing was contracting, unemployment was rising. The Pandemic lockdowns allowed policy makers a way to explain why the economy was in dire straits and provided a further reason to pump trillions directly into people’s bank accounts.
Please correct me if I am wrong as I am not in the science or medical field, but I believe trying to induce and anti-body response by injecting a toxic substance (adjuvant) with some other substance is the wrong way to go. Instead we should all be learning how to increase our T-cells to fight off all illnesses, whether it be the common cold or cancer. The anti-bodies only last maybe as long as the toxic substance in the body, maybe not. Then our bodies got to work to get the toxic substance out. This toxic substance can accumulate in our bodies and make us sick with a variety of illnesses later on.
So the golden question is how do we increase our T-cells. Plus it wouldn't hurt to make sure our bodies don't have some kind of parasite etc in it to hamper our ability to stay healthy. If our body health is slowed down by parasites etc.. then we simply can't put up a decent fight against an illness.
Thanks for catching up. Sorry for the snark and I do appreciate the reconsideration in light of the growing data. My point is simply that no one should have advocated for an experimental jab for an obviously teed up marketing campaign, where the level of global cooperation (talking points, masking, PCR nonsense, etc) was on full display. Sorry, it was always wrong to advocate something that had zero supporting data. Zero. By entities who are anything but credible no less.
Once it's in the body there is no way out and any risk/benefit analysis was never a 'real' thing. Survival rates for whatever the hell covid was, were always high.
Thank you, but I would like to emphasise that we have always been against all forms of mandates and coercion, and in favour of freedom of choice and fully informed consent, and our previous position was also consistent with those principles.
I feel a little snarky myself but understand that real science is slow, guesses, intuition while they can be correct aren't the same thing. What is aggravating is how those in charge know this and renamed science "the science" so they could take ownership of it and make claims that they knew full well they didn't have any evidence to make. Like' if you take these shots, you won't get sick, the virus stops with you', etc. People look back and say, but they didn't know at the time, and that's the issue, they DIDN'T know, they knew they didn't know, so they knew they couldn't make those claims. Last I checked the world health association was saying that masking has a 'mechanistic probability' of working. Can anyone tell me what that actually means and how it relates to humans?
Failed experiment? No, MURDER
https://outraged.substack.com/p/new-zealand-health-ministry-whistleblower
nzloyal.org.nz
https://rumble.com/v3ynskd-operation-m.o.a.r-mother-of-all-revelations.html NEW ZEALAND HEALTH MINISTRY WHISTLEBLOWER
VIDEO YOU MUST WATCH
I've been told by someone from Wuhan I worked with recently that the initial lockdowns there were to stop the locals destroying 5G towers to stop the spread of "the telephone disease".
You'll find more about it here:
https://stateofthenation.co/?page_id=12927
If you are interested there is an eye-opening presentation by Dr Denis Rancourt he has jut released.
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/fundamental-nature-of-health
As an Accident and Emergency Dept nurse of 30 years, it's not surprising people with acute respiratory symptoms, who are told to isolate for 14 days, end up presenting too late with acute respiratory failure, sepsis and multi organ failure. No surprise, the only part of acute hospitals that were struggling with capacity were critical care units.
P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine.
"Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production."
It was abundantly clear the scamdemic was front loaded. The "experts" advising CEPI/Brighton Collaboration were clueless in March 2020. By Dec 2020, some 9mo later, the entire British population was undergoing assault. QED, the means of production was already in place and rolling. WEF/BMGF/WHO will know all this in infinite, precise detail, for this is their attempt at subverting freedom, instigating corruption, and perpetrating sickness and death. It is the greatest assault ever experienced in human history. And the future still remains in uncertain balance.
This is the clearest, most articulate explanation for the "it"-hypothesis, which seems to throw other members of Team Reality into a tail spin. If I had had this concise story, I would not only could have challenged the going Narrative better, but I probably would have more friends on the Team Reality side. Thank you.
You’re very welcome. Pleased to be of service.
I would say this summary is only possible with the passage of time and benefit of hindsight. That is, no one could have written it until late 2023. :)
"There is no convincing evidence that the spread of any pathogen - as opposed to the spread of waves of fear, panic and medical dystopia - is directly linked to waves of fatal illnesses."
The whole thing stank of a scam by February, 2020. No one, including doctors, ever listed a single symptom of "covid" that wasn't shared with colds or the flu. Within a month of that alleged Italy outbreak I'd found articles about the 2006/2007 New England "pertussis outbreak" created by the attempted diagnostic use of PCR: 100% false positives. Those articles included the CDC's warnings about PCR, warnings that it forgot all about by 2020. By 2021 it was obvious from the total deaths per year statistics in the US that there was no pandemic: More people died in the US in 2018 than in 2020, and no one would argue that there was a pandemic in 2018.
I'm with Mike Yeadon on the existence of a novel pathogen: There wasn't one. A real pathogen is too unpredictable to be useful--and probably too tame. All the vaporing about "gain-of-function" research is a feint. Creating a furor over a lab escapee is classic misdirection to focus attention away from the fact that the DoD, NSA, and CIA were running a psyop, a false flag operation, a scam, and a rehearsed, scheduled "crisis." Scott Gottlieb, Matthew Pottinger, Deborah Birx, and now Renee DiResta are operatives. Nothing's easier to fake than a virus. Nothing's more useful for creating fear than an invisible, unknown angel of death. Nothing's more effective for making people beg to be ruled harder.
Precisely.
The stunning thing is that the medical "establishment" has been so completely and willingly co-opted. What it also shows is that critical thinking and ethics of the supposedly well educated left the room a long time ago. The culpable ignorance in play is a truly repulsive manifestation of evil masquerading as "bafflement."
The abject risible nonsense that is self-evident in the publication by J.Gen.Virol. in 1967, "The Morphology of Three Previously Uncharacterized Human Respiratory Viruses that Grow in Organ Culture," Almeida and Tyrrell. .... the "birth" of corona "viruses."
"A simple method is described for examining organ cultures by electron microscopy for the presence of virus particles. The method was used to detect the presence of three hitherto uncharacterized viruses. Two of these have particles resembling those of infectious bronchitis of chickens and the third morphologically resembles the parainfluenza group of viruses."
Whenever "safety" is mentioned, I ask "What type of safety data are you referring to?"
In clinical trials, safety data is comprised of lab results, procedural results, and adverse event reporting. In normal phase 2/3 studies, lab work is done prior to being given the drug and afterwards, at at many visits throughout the trial. There are also procedures like ECGs, vitals, physical exams, etc. For a simple asthma medication, we would do serial labs where we would do ECG, vitals, lots of labs, then dose the patient, then repeat all the procedures at 1 hr post dose, 4 hrs post, etc. We would do this at multiple visits. For some reason, vaccines do not follow this standard. But these mRNAs were "first in class" and should have undergone all the previously mentioned tests.
If you read the Pfizer protocol, their combined phase 2/3 only tested for immunogenicity. That was it. No other labs or ECGs or even vitals were done. How can they possibly claim "safety" when they did no tests?
The only "safety" data they used were adverse events reported during the trial and then proceeded to ignore AE reporting systems like VAERs.
It is unbelievable that no pre/post drug labs or procedures were done. They have no idea (or they do) what happens in the body after injection.
So, ask them: When you say safety data, what data are you referring to? What tests were done to show safety? Were there changes in ECGs pre and post dose? How about liver function? Cardiac enzymes? Inflammatory biomarkers? Heart rate? Blood pressure?
They know nothing.
I remember at the time someone commenting that there should have been a massive recruitment effort for people to run the trials and process all the necessary data and there wasn't
Except in this case, there wasn't any data because they didn't run the tests. In the study protocol, which describes what the sites running the trial are supposed to do, the "Schedule of Activities" lists all the procedures that are to be done for each study subject. There were simply no labs, ECGs, etc. that were to be done. None at all so no data to process.
"Rather than asking the question “were the vaccines needed as a response to the pandemic?” we should instead be asking “was the pandemic needed for the vaccines?”.
I think your question is answered easily,
The industry is a racket that uses the Hegelian dialectic to create vast profits.
It is also clear that they (BMGF) have trapped Government into provided protection by using legal plunder and government giving this industry Blanket immunity from prosecution.
This was a BMGF created indemnity using the Swiss Gov. The vaccination alliance GAVI, founded by Bill Gates, enjoys immunity in Switzerland. Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, exposed what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance. Stuckelberger pointed out that Gates and the WHO entered into a three-way contract agreement with Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, which is highly unusual. So, essentially, when Gates did not get voted in as a one-man nation-state, he created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, essentially placing him on par with the WHO!
Locally Fahrie Hassan too has exposed BMGF influence in South African Government. It is skulduggery and he is getting away with it everywhere.
Phala-Phala is a prime example. Ramaphosa stopped the Public Protector Mkhwebane from exposing this crime so it was said in the media.
There is so much Tax-Payer money being handed out by Governments to the Vaccine Industrial Complex and they are all getting kickbacks, including the Parties like the DA.
Thanks for this neat and pithy summary.
If I were to forward it to my Covidian family members, how should I answer this question:
"Oh, yeah? So what do you think happened in Italy in March 2020?"
Simple, It was a load of crock created to instil fear into gullible minds. It had nothing to do with any phantom. The Phantom was created to sell salvation. The salvation was called vaccines, it wasn't though. It was an agenda of the eugenicists who are heavily invested in the VIC and Big Pharma.
I would say something like that if my goal were to get drummed out of all family events. The immediate comeback from them to that kind of argument, is to ask:
"Yeah, so nobody died and they were all actors, right?"
They will not accept mere theories and hypotheses, these will get me lumped in with the QAnon crowd and the "the moon landing was staged" people. I'd rather have facts and data to quote to them, as these are harder to dismiss out of hand.
I just came across this long write-up https://healthfreedomdefense.org/italy-2020-inside-covids-ground-zero-was-there-really-a-pandemic/ that looks promising. To my mind, the strongest line of attack is the one that deals with how the definitions of a "Covid case" and a "Covid death" were changed in midstream, giving the impression that suddenly there was a massive new threat going around. It would be a huge project, but I wish that somebody with the means would set out to compare systematically how different definitions in different countries affected the reporting of infections and deaths.
If everyone has had a couple drinks, I would say “mass euthanasia and data fraud toward staging sudden spread of a novel coronavirus and convincing healthcare workers in other counties that something real was happening.”
If everyone is sober, go with Jonathan’s approach. :)
The waste water testing showed it In Italy as early as December 2019. ( I know from another source who was in Italy at the time, they got sick in June/July with an unusual flu like bug) More surprisingly, researchers at the University of Barcelona found traces of the virus when testing untreated wastewater samples dated March 12, 2019.
BUT once the govt decided to call it pandemic, things turned bad, It was the beginning of Winter they put all the elderly "sick" outside the hospital in tents in the cold. They closed off the area and refused to allow more Drs and others to help treat people. Normal ways of treating respiratory illnesses were ignored
Oh and when was this "virus" isolated and characterised. There was no virus. That are of Italy is heavily polluted by air pollution. Your I know "source was speculating". No researches have ever found any virus. Virology a pseudo-science, a scare story. Look for the bowtie Goblins.
I get that too. Its always the same. All other logical arguments are put aside using the same examples, Northern Italy and New York. Jonathan provided solid argumentation already. Unfortunately I never get that far with Covidians. However cautious I approach them, they just dont want an open discussion based on facts. So, if one does not form its opinion on facts, what else is left? Fear, superstition, blind trust in authorities? Way to go!
Who ever thinks they can fool the immune system plays with fire. saw the recent discussion between John Campbell and Clare Craig.
Well I would start be responding:
Don't you think it's weird that in arguing for a global pandemic you focus on a single area? I thought this was a global problem yet the first thing you think about is a single region? It's supposedly a globally spreading virus? Didn't it have roughly the same effects everywhere. If not, how come?
This all just illustrates how important in the narrative that particular region was.
Yet does what happened there stand up to scrutiny?
Then I would present these pieces (2nd one by yours truly):
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/italy-2020-the-preposterous-pandemic/
https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/were-the-unprecedented-excess-deaths?sd=pf
They may well then move onto the horror of New York:. But again, it is highly anomalous. If what happened there is such an outlier why is nobody asking why? And how and why should what happened there have driven assumptions about what was happening globally?
https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/does-new-york-city-2020-make-any
That’s always my retort, too;
“So, do you think we had a pandemic where we are?
Because the data says not”.
Excellent expression of what transpired..
"There never was a lethal pandemic of any pathogen which was “risk additive” to the already existing causes of respiratory infections. This is the case whether or not there was something some might regard as “novel” circulating, whether “it” came from a lab or was zoonotic in origin, and whether “it” originated in China or elsewhere."
You and others are probably aware of this, but if not, here's how the trainwreck of all trainwrecks may happen -
https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwreck-of-all-trainwrecks-billions-of-people-stuck-with-a-broken-immune-response/
tryBUn^Ls are long overdue. There is enough evidence and the criminals are out in the open. A core set of righteously minded individuals must be chosen and given international authority to hold these tryBUn^LS. This is not to just target people and use them as scapegoats...Nuremberg did that. Perhaps start with the implementers and drivers of this (bioweapon) as ONE of the catagories for accountability and from there filter through the system/agenda of the scam? I cannot foresee any other lasting solution.
A second question is whether the pandemic was ‘needed’ to provide an excuse for the economic debacle that was already underway. For both questions, one needs to examine the ostensible reason and then the potential real reason.
Pre Covid the economy was faltering, housing was contracting, unemployment was rising. The Pandemic lockdowns allowed policy makers a way to explain why the economy was in dire straits and provided a further reason to pump trillions directly into people’s bank accounts.
Please correct me if I am wrong as I am not in the science or medical field, but I believe trying to induce and anti-body response by injecting a toxic substance (adjuvant) with some other substance is the wrong way to go. Instead we should all be learning how to increase our T-cells to fight off all illnesses, whether it be the common cold or cancer. The anti-bodies only last maybe as long as the toxic substance in the body, maybe not. Then our bodies got to work to get the toxic substance out. This toxic substance can accumulate in our bodies and make us sick with a variety of illnesses later on.
So the golden question is how do we increase our T-cells. Plus it wouldn't hurt to make sure our bodies don't have some kind of parasite etc in it to hamper our ability to stay healthy. If our body health is slowed down by parasites etc.. then we simply can't put up a decent fight against an illness.
Thanks for catching up. Sorry for the snark and I do appreciate the reconsideration in light of the growing data. My point is simply that no one should have advocated for an experimental jab for an obviously teed up marketing campaign, where the level of global cooperation (talking points, masking, PCR nonsense, etc) was on full display. Sorry, it was always wrong to advocate something that had zero supporting data. Zero. By entities who are anything but credible no less.
Once it's in the body there is no way out and any risk/benefit analysis was never a 'real' thing. Survival rates for whatever the hell covid was, were always high.
Thank you, but I would like to emphasise that we have always been against all forms of mandates and coercion, and in favour of freedom of choice and fully informed consent, and our previous position was also consistent with those principles.
I feel a little snarky myself but understand that real science is slow, guesses, intuition while they can be correct aren't the same thing. What is aggravating is how those in charge know this and renamed science "the science" so they could take ownership of it and make claims that they knew full well they didn't have any evidence to make. Like' if you take these shots, you won't get sick, the virus stops with you', etc. People look back and say, but they didn't know at the time, and that's the issue, they DIDN'T know, they knew they didn't know, so they knew they couldn't make those claims. Last I checked the world health association was saying that masking has a 'mechanistic probability' of working. Can anyone tell me what that actually means and how it relates to humans?
Important point - and it's appreciated. Thank you.