39 Comments
Apr 9, 2023Liked by TNK

There is not one single angle in which these disastrous strategies can be justified. These hve been the worst three years of my life, and that is really saying something. I will never forget, and never forgive. This has been an absolute outrage. The only way this is never going to happen again is via the establishment of righteous trybuN@Ls of people of high integrity and with a deep compassion and understanding of the trauma. Those P..A.R.A.S.I.T.E. lot are not human in that they are completely devoid of conscience or empathy. We must investigate HOW we allowed this to happen...or rather what circumstances has allowed people to ELECT THEMSELVES through the manipulation of laws, the use of CORRUPTION via Government prostitution, making their bastardisations legal, bypassing public inclusion i.e. through deceit! NO LAW should be allowed for people to exercise, and hence MANIFEST, this perversion. That Harari guy (as just ONE example) is utterly insane and at any other time in history, would have been declared criminally insane and removed from society. We are dealing with thugs who buy their impunity.

Expand full comment

I assume the authors of this estimate were all Phd's. Now I know what the letters mean, "Piled Higher and Deeper", PHD.

Expand full comment

Eventually, people will realize a vaccine was neither possible nor warranted.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023Liked by TNK

Thank you for such a clear explanation of the exageration of the figures. Anything to try to make the shots look effective.

Expand full comment

in blunt terms, "4 killed for every 3 saved"),

Do they plan to make it up in volume?

Expand full comment

Didn’t that come from, at least in part, from the Imperial College that gave those impossible-and wrong-predictions of Covid infections and deaths?

Expand full comment

This is an excellent analysis.

But might I suggest that it is impossible that COVID jabs saved even ONE life?

The basis of vaccinology - that antibodies provide immunity - was disproved decades ago.

Vaccines = all risk/no benefit.

Expand full comment

A+ debunking. I look forward to the next debunking of the next preposterous claim.

Here's my latest debunking/rebuttal:

AP hatchet job on RFK, Jr. is a new low for mainstream journalism.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/hatchet-job-on-rfk-jr-is-new-low

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023Liked by TNK

I was always curious about the 14.4mill number. I have not read the original paper, but that number can be arrived at:

1. assume COVID has a 1% death rate (which is a bit below what the covidiots were claiming)

2. assume all 9,000,000,000 people on the planet get COVID

3. 9,000,000,000 x 1% = 90,000,000 deaths (a)

4. Pfizer's own documents claim an ARR of .84%

5. 9,000,000,000 x .84% = 75,600,000 (b)

6. (a) - (b) = 90,000,000 - 75,600,000 = 14,400,000 like magic the vax has saved this many people

Of course, some heroic assumptions there, but it's strange how that number jumps out !

Expand full comment

Did you use a supercomputer or an Imperial College "model" for that?!

Expand full comment

LOL !

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023Liked by TNK

Impressive stats & logic to debunk the WHO agenda. Now how do we get the masses to see the reality and prevent the WHO taking over the world.

Expand full comment

The gist really is all you need.

They LIED about how effective they were.

Expand full comment

Some of that went way over my layman's head. But I certainly got the gist of it. I wonder if there's a more simple way to break this down for people like me.

Expand full comment

If you get the gist, might I suggest you try reading the article again. It'll probably become more clear on the 2nd pass.

Expand full comment

Actually I did. And it did. Thanks.

Expand full comment

As we have seen so far under Biden, this current FBI/DOJ, the UN/WHO, the CCP....if you believe these people tell the truth or are acting in your favor you really do need care with a shrink for it proves you are delusional...an infectious type that spreads to susceptible people who believe everything and do little thinking for themselves....those who think others with differing opinions are traitors to their Marxist principles and dogma.

Expand full comment

The current US administration is beyond disappointing, no question.

But don't hold out hope of the other party riding to the rescue if they get enough votes. This thing has tentacles reaching into both US parties and all through corporate America. And there's no reason to think it stops at the US border.

As the Senator in the X-Files said repeatedly, "Trust No One."

Expand full comment

Sure. The shrink will then prescribe or recommend poisons to help settle your mind.

[Edited: the word "poisons" mysteriously dropped out!]

Expand full comment

Great analysis.

The trouble with lying (i.e., faking reality) is that you have to remember that reality remains, leaving open the possibility that the lies you tell will not only contradict reality, but in a discoverable way.

Some generosity must allow for some people to unintentionally be wrong, without being made into liars once it is discovered that their claim is truly impossible. We need the right to be wrong.

But for "experts" opining on life-and-death matters, the normal allowance for wrong claims is no longer appropriate. When experts opine on life-and-death matters, it is proper to hold them morally accountable for wrong claims -- such as by judging them as liars, unless they can prove-their-innocence by showing how they were duped.

The default position should be that they should have known better, or, if not, that they should have said nothing at all. The importance of human life requires that much.

I created a visual that captures the absurdity of the claimed number of lives saved:

https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/addendum-to-easily-debunkable-doctor

Expand full comment
author

You were thinking along the same lines - nice analysis. It's so simple to debunk this propaganda. Too bad most officials and media sold their souls to pharma.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023Liked by TNK

Everyone conveniently ignores the "gold standard" mortality data from the Pfizer and Moderna randomized blinded clinical trials, which revealed 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths with mRNA vaccines (in blunt terms, "4 killed for every 3 saved"), even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-2021. The separate Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" randomized clinical trials BOTH had a 15-17% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo.

Pfizer: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf – Table S4

Moderna: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf – Table S26

The RCT mortality data clearly show that mRNA vaccines are equally or more likely to cause death rather than prevent death, and the data also show that any meaningful overall "lifesaving" benefit is very unlikely.

Expand full comment

We plan to cover that in a future article. Just working on the manuscript now. Hang on.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023Liked by TNK

Excellent. It is very hard to find anyone who has the sincerity, integrity, dedication, and courage to cover the damning gold-standard RCT results which show that mRNA vaccines are at least as likely to "kill" people as to "save" them, even at the height of the pandemic.

The following is the closest I've seen as far as a layman's article on the RCT mortality results: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/. It's quite a good start on a very uncomfortable topic, but unfortunately their slightly sensationalist style will put off many people even though their numbers are correct, and the biggest problem is they didn't explain why these randomized blinded prospective studies are the gold-standard as there are profound biases in observational vaccine studies that conveniently work almost 100% in favor of the vaccine.

So if you could cover the RCT mortality results in a slightly more scientific and objective manner than that article did, that would be a tremendous service for humanity. (I would have loved to help as it's right up my alley). The RCT mortality results are by far the most important and least biased data on whether or not the mRNA vaccines save lives, period. The public absolutely DESERVES to know.

Expand full comment

One of the (many) elephants in the room is the fact that 81% of the population at large was never susceptible to serious illness in the first place, as evidenced by the Diamond Princess and the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt in early 2020. How many interventions claiming efficacy are merely piggybacking on that reality?

Expand full comment
author

We have an analysis of the Diamond Princess data coming any day now - we come at it from a different angle but yes, the DP data should have been all the info anyone needed to judge the "severity".

Expand full comment

Looking forward to that. The DP was a confirming turning point for me. Mid to late February 2020 wasn't it? Long before Lockdowns began.

Expand full comment