It's a copy-past (even the wording) with omissions and adding the China red herring misdirection (bc this accounts is here to obfuscate and confuse) from a few but mostly one excellent commentator!
I have to agree with his assessment. I did have technically have "covid" ( ill and positive PCR) and the symptoms were gnarlier than previous flu infections. However, I also had a mysterious lung infection many, many years ago that lasted far longer and caused strange ongoing immune issues for several years and it was never diagnosed as any particular infection back then. So, it seems to me that given the sheer number of potential respiratory infections, the bigger issue here is that it is quite easy to give the impression of a singular viral pandemic if you claim identification of one particular virus WHILST simultaneously not treating ANY potential severe respiratory infection with the usual appropriate mixed treatment of steroids, antibiotics and other things to support respiratory health.
Some very interesting topics were covered, but (at least) one thing requires an answer ... the people that fell ill (before being admitted to hospital) didn't imagine it, or fake the symptoms that the majority felt were unlike "regular flu" or anything else they'd ever had before.
So what did infect them? Something clearly did, it wasn't due to "panic", "stress" or "media driven fear".
Perhaps it wasn't a lethal pathogen spreading from a single (or a few) places such as Wuhan, (whatever the spread was, it didn't appear to be happening in the usual way for something like a respiratory virus), but presumably it was a pathogen nevertheless, and possibly as the result of Gain of Function tampering (which we know was occurring in various locations simultaneously, although who knows how sucessful it was or will ever be), a manipulated virus that was released or escaped that generally became deadly not in and of itself but due to flawed "treatments" or lack thereof, (such as the criminal lack of 3 tablets which would've cured most bacterial pneumonias)
But I'm convinced the holy grail was the launching of the mRNA platform itself, and the EUAs for mRNA "vaccines" relied on no Antibiotics or Ivermectin, anything already in existence which might be shown to be an effective treatment ... to protect the future of the platform they "couldn't" be used, only the so-called vaccines could "save the day" (sic)
Does PANDA have a similar document that addresses there concluding remarks "It is worth emphasising that there are some aspects of the above which we do not agree with, and also some notable omissions" I only ask because giving the Arkmedic document to someone who has not be following all the inconsistencies in the narrative might not persuade them otherwise. Because as you state, "We are not sold on the Covid era being instituted by China, though China clearly benefited economically, but then so did many international corporations and governments." So the Arkmedic document could be passed off as some paranoid anti CCP take. Like I say I am always searching for some over arching document to give to people who don't understand what happened maybe a big ask as if people aren't ready to hear they won't get it.
What confuses me as well is some of the topics of the infighting/massive disagreement. Are some of these people not serious? https://x.com/soothspider/status/1760845711393042819 If alignment, particularly of all the major points, is achieved then why is the focus just on these small points? Let's suppose they are right. What does it matter? Does it change anything we have to do? Does it leave open some doors that should be shut? Maybe that's the real question we need to ask. (Maybe why some people don't want to condemn the entire Transfection capability strategy regardless of delivery platform – at least without addressing the immune system (PRRs)).
In the quoted Substack post, Arkmedic writes that "the PCR tests were not specific enough to detect “COVID” only".
The PCR tests have been amply examined for their near-uselessness. How about the antigen home tests that the government sent out and that people could also pick up at drugstores -- anybody know of a good analysis of their actual value for detecting Covid infections?
So is China not really our enemy? They obviously worked in close cooperation with the US and other world governments to create this fake pandemic. I'm guessing there are no real enemies other than the group seeking world domination and control. And they are still unidentifiable.
What keeps surprising me is that people keep repeating the obvious fraude that goes on. I say obvious, because this has been going on for decades, if not centuries, in 1001 methods. Until we stop the blaming, calling out the baddies and expect justice which will not come, we will not create a space and momentum for peace, progress and prosperity. Too many keep pointing at the iceberg, while the Titanic is already at the bottom of the ocean.
He seems to have switched to pushing worn out old chestnut RNA pandemic narrative since then. Decided to align himself with team worst case scenario for some strange reason.
Great flashback, fun if someone could map the censorship targeted to #3tablets hashtag. In fairness to the pandemic planners we should note that a novel spread originating from a single point and blanketing the globe has been seen before in Cat in the Hat with the pink snow! :~)
It's a copy-past (even the wording) with omissions and adding the China red herring misdirection (bc this accounts is here to obfuscate and confuse) from a few but mostly one excellent commentator!
I have to agree with his assessment. I did have technically have "covid" ( ill and positive PCR) and the symptoms were gnarlier than previous flu infections. However, I also had a mysterious lung infection many, many years ago that lasted far longer and caused strange ongoing immune issues for several years and it was never diagnosed as any particular infection back then. So, it seems to me that given the sheer number of potential respiratory infections, the bigger issue here is that it is quite easy to give the impression of a singular viral pandemic if you claim identification of one particular virus WHILST simultaneously not treating ANY potential severe respiratory infection with the usual appropriate mixed treatment of steroids, antibiotics and other things to support respiratory health.
Some very interesting topics were covered, but (at least) one thing requires an answer ... the people that fell ill (before being admitted to hospital) didn't imagine it, or fake the symptoms that the majority felt were unlike "regular flu" or anything else they'd ever had before.
So what did infect them? Something clearly did, it wasn't due to "panic", "stress" or "media driven fear".
Perhaps it wasn't a lethal pathogen spreading from a single (or a few) places such as Wuhan, (whatever the spread was, it didn't appear to be happening in the usual way for something like a respiratory virus), but presumably it was a pathogen nevertheless, and possibly as the result of Gain of Function tampering (which we know was occurring in various locations simultaneously, although who knows how sucessful it was or will ever be), a manipulated virus that was released or escaped that generally became deadly not in and of itself but due to flawed "treatments" or lack thereof, (such as the criminal lack of 3 tablets which would've cured most bacterial pneumonias)
But I'm convinced the holy grail was the launching of the mRNA platform itself, and the EUAs for mRNA "vaccines" relied on no Antibiotics or Ivermectin, anything already in existence which might be shown to be an effective treatment ... to protect the future of the platform they "couldn't" be used, only the so-called vaccines could "save the day" (sic)
Does PANDA have a similar document that addresses there concluding remarks "It is worth emphasising that there are some aspects of the above which we do not agree with, and also some notable omissions" I only ask because giving the Arkmedic document to someone who has not be following all the inconsistencies in the narrative might not persuade them otherwise. Because as you state, "We are not sold on the Covid era being instituted by China, though China clearly benefited economically, but then so did many international corporations and governments." So the Arkmedic document could be passed off as some paranoid anti CCP take. Like I say I am always searching for some over arching document to give to people who don't understand what happened maybe a big ask as if people aren't ready to hear they won't get it.
What confuses me as well is some of the topics of the infighting/massive disagreement. Are some of these people not serious? https://x.com/soothspider/status/1760845711393042819 If alignment, particularly of all the major points, is achieved then why is the focus just on these small points? Let's suppose they are right. What does it matter? Does it change anything we have to do? Does it leave open some doors that should be shut? Maybe that's the real question we need to ask. (Maybe why some people don't want to condemn the entire Transfection capability strategy regardless of delivery platform – at least without addressing the immune system (PRRs)).
In the quoted Substack post, Arkmedic writes that "the PCR tests were not specific enough to detect “COVID” only".
The PCR tests have been amply examined for their near-uselessness. How about the antigen home tests that the government sent out and that people could also pick up at drugstores -- anybody know of a good analysis of their actual value for detecting Covid infections?
So from all of that, I would ask an odd question:
So is China not really our enemy? They obviously worked in close cooperation with the US and other world governments to create this fake pandemic. I'm guessing there are no real enemies other than the group seeking world domination and control. And they are still unidentifiable.
1 million likes!
A 4 year deadly viral pandemic is so F-ing absurd it makes my head ache!
What keeps surprising me is that people keep repeating the obvious fraude that goes on. I say obvious, because this has been going on for decades, if not centuries, in 1001 methods. Until we stop the blaming, calling out the baddies and expect justice which will not come, we will not create a space and momentum for peace, progress and prosperity. Too many keep pointing at the iceberg, while the Titanic is already at the bottom of the ocean.
He seems to have switched to pushing worn out old chestnut RNA pandemic narrative since then. Decided to align himself with team worst case scenario for some strange reason.
Great flashback, fun if someone could map the censorship targeted to #3tablets hashtag. In fairness to the pandemic planners we should note that a novel spread originating from a single point and blanketing the globe has been seen before in Cat in the Hat with the pink snow! :~)
https://seussblog.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/the-cat-in-the-hat-comes-back/