93 Comments
User's avatar
Martillo's avatar

YOU are the disease; their mRNA death squirt$ the cure. Say no to the devils' drug$ while you still can.

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

For over two decades the scientific literature has refereed to mRNA as TRANSFECTION so it boggles the mind this failed cancer therapy is still misnamed "vaccine" when syringe delivery is the only thing the two treatments have in common. These transfections are always deadly and calling them vaccines to build on misplaced public faith in traditional vaccines helps nobody!!

https://rumble.com/v4kc73l-dr-mike-yeadon.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html

Expand full comment
mykcooper's avatar

There's going to be some sore arms around. Comforting that mine won't be part of them.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Build it, and they will be jabbed!

Covid jab campaign taught us that:

1. The masses will comply.

2. The ensuing deaths can be glossed over.

3. They need more capacity yo hit everyone at once, globally and repeatedly.

4. The dream of massive depop op will be achieved the very next time around.

5. Unless the nuclear war comes first.

Expand full comment
Wendy Llewellyn's avatar

Leopards it would appear do not change their Hitlerian shirts - this is so evil words fail

Expand full comment
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

If the doses do not exist it's money laundering and a new form of fictional currency in the post-petrodollar global economy. If the doses do exist, they intend on poisoning every living creature, born and unborn on the planet for the purposes of depopulation and control with digital ID.

Future's so bright I gotta wear shades.

Expand full comment
pobrecollie's avatar

We were told that the scamdemic was a once in a lifetime event, yet now we seem to be expecting one every winter, straight after global climate boiling season has ended.

Expand full comment
chris marten's avatar

This is their second stage plan for global genocide

Expand full comment
Eric M's avatar

Worth noting:

The streetname of BioNTech's Mainz HQ is

"An der Goldgrube", which translates, both literally and figuratively, to "on the goldmine".

Goldgrube = goldmine, moneymaker, cash cow, etc.

Here is a comment I made on a post by Good Sir Robert a while back:

https://x.com/Mr_Pique/status/1797238006627139726

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

"Why would a country of just 80 million people need 400 million or more vaccine doses per year?"

Because customers in/from other countries are already lined up.

Expand full comment
Patrick Wahle's avatar

Because Ursula von der Leyen is in charge of marketing and sales. Her husband Heiko needs a new job after “resigning” from Orgenesis.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I regret to say I am pretty sure I do know the answer & I’ve been talking about it for well over three years.

All mRNA based injections are intentionally toxic.

I expect these injections are to be used as part of a global, digital, totalitarian control system.

You’ll be required to be “up to date with the WHO recommended vaccines” in order that your mandatory digital ID retains its validity.

If you decline, you’ll find life very restrictive.

If you accept, over time, it will injure or kill you.

This is to be one arm of the means of bringing about population reduction while maintaining a gossamer thin layer of plausible deniability.

Credentials: more than 30 years in big pharma and biotech, to executive level in corporate and CEO in biotech. Training included mechanistic toxicology and a PhD in respiratory pharmacology.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

I have no official credentials as a Corporate America dropout as I left my fancy career after an attempt to coerce me into falsifying data pertaining to federally sponsored research but I know you are correct.

Expand full comment
Patrick's avatar

This is Military industrial complex, war economy, nothing to do with health

Expand full comment
Stephen Due's avatar

Hilarious. The Moderna factory in Victoria, Australia will be able to make 100 million doses per year. Nobody really knows what will be in these injections, but that doesn't matter, because obviously it must be good for you. After all, it's called a 'vaccine'. It's a pity there is no vaccine to cure politicians, oligarchs, parliamentarians, health officials and others of LYING to the public.

Expand full comment
Frances's avatar

Moderna facility in Montreal area expected to produce 100 million vaccine doses by 2024. A 10-year contract deal with cdn. govt and moderna. Pourquoi/why?

Expand full comment
Patrick Wahle's avatar

Because Trudeau needs his dividends from Acuitas Therapeutics (nanoparticles) after being ousted from Rideau Hall next year.

Expand full comment
carlo's avatar

No wonder, it all started with Cristian Drosten.

...unfortunately, another 100,000,000 euros (of taxpayers) down the toilet.

The strategy: Help! the Wolf the Wolf" only works 1 time.

They can try to terrorize again with the next xyz pandemic, project it with the usual fake PCR swabs on the main stream media, but they can stick their billions of doses in that place...

Expand full comment
Eric M's avatar

Excuse me, did you not read the decency rules for forums? The word "Drosten"Is unfit for use in polite discussion.

Expand full comment
Triumphant Ape's avatar

Is it possible that the general public is being used as test subjects to perfect mRNA vaccines for use by "others" down the road?

I've read the suggestions as to what the SARS COV 2 mRNA vax was, "depopulation", "greed", some others I won't mention, the interesting thing was the variation in the lots, with some being very toxic and some apparently doing nothing at all.

Some suggested this was a "plausible deniability" tactic, but it also sounds like experimenting to me.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

Early on, the extraordinary variation in toxicity could not be anything other than a deliberate act.

I think you’d be correct to regard it as a form of calibration of biological weapons.

Expand full comment
pobrecollie's avatar

Off topic Mike, but on your Telegram channel (Tim has banned me from commenting there) you mentioned being on painkillers. Have you looked into kratom, a natural version, that many have used to come off of opiods. It's legality varies by country.

Expand full comment
Robert Kogon's avatar

Thanks for your comments. Well, but at least the variation found in the Danish study was chronological: first period, highly toxic; second, somewhat toxic; third, almost not at all. I have a different theory. First “blue” lots contained mRNA from Pfizer Andover; second “green” lots from BioNTech Marburg (I suspect at lower dose); and third “yellow” lots contained no mRNA, just empty LNPs. I think this explains what happened in Europe. I suspect the pattern of variation is different in the US and I wonder if there really is variation in the US. I would not be surprised if the US has been getting the highly toxic full dose the whole time.

See my articles here: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/24/did-pfizer-biontech-placebo-vaccine-doses-contain-empty-lipids-without-mrna/ and here: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/04/13/did-highly-toxic-blue-vaccine-batches-contain-pfizer-not-biontech-mrna/.

They got virtually no visibility. No post with the words “Robert Kogon” in it ever has reach on X nowadays; better not to mention him over there. But they might be of interest for you.

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

Variation in the U.S. would be likeliest by city/metro area

Expand full comment
Robert Kogon's avatar

Why do you think? I've come across let's say "geographical" theories like that. But the Danish authors found relative toxicity correlated with particular sets of batches and those batches were in fact deployed all over Europe (though the Danes only had access to the safety data and the numbers deployed for Denmark). I don't think anyone has done this kind of study for the States.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. Different schemes in different continents, where there was no possibility of inadvertent leakage from one destination to another.

I haven’t read your articles. I’m up against the gun on several deadlines atm

Expand full comment
Robert Kogon's avatar

When you have time!

Expand full comment
Jan's avatar

It cannot have been a test, because it is impossible to ever produce safe and effective mRNA-vaccines. The mRNA jumps into the DNA. This is promoted by SV40, that guarantees in other projects that mRNA is written into the genome.

DNA-integration is arbitrary. It jumps into the "morse code" of the cell and depending on where it jumps to the message becomes another text. When the DNA is expressed, another than the healthy code is executed creating junk proteins.

This process makes it so difficult to correlate symptom, vaccination and cause. This is perfect for denialability but not for tests.

Expand full comment
Triumphant Ape's avatar

It seems the correlation is happening regardless, there are several studies now which suggest life span is shortened, death and maiming are also on the table.

All in the vaccinated people.

I haven't really looked into this particular post, but it's a common theme.

https://kirschsubstack.com/cp/146180280

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

Only people who ignore facts have suggested "depopulation"....In Australia for instance the mean age of death By/with Covid was about 83.3 years old...

Expand full comment
Mathieu Kerjouan's avatar

Perhaps because autopsies for younger people were not available or not the death was considered a side effect? That's pretty useful to create categories, you can select only what you want/need. Furthermore, where did these old people die? At hospital? at rest home? depending of the answer, autopsies can be mandatory in some case. In some place, autopsies are not even required... So, your data is biased. Anyway, it can only say one think: keep asking questions and keep looking for the truth, that's the only way to be sure.

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

If we were in a third world country I am sure they do not do autopsies.Hint..we are not a third world country...The narrative at the time was test and exaggerate ..yet the same group was doing autopsies of everyone but not finding death by covid for under 19 years..mmmm...makes you think right?(sarcasm).....Their location at death would probably have been in a hospital.All data is biased..to some degree..so flipping what??If you want to live with "no data" no matter what then how in hell could you make any decision...? .Dont lecture anyone..your clearly not in any position to do that.,.,..your ridiculously idiotic and rhetorical/patronising questions mean I am not the one who needs to keep seeking the truth...try and read a bit and lighten up tiger...

Expand full comment
Mathieu Kerjouan's avatar

Why so angry? Keep cool. It was just a question and a point of view. I'm not from your country, I'm from France, and autopsies are not always mandatory there, it depends on many factors, and in some context, you need to ask the family to do it. Its only mandatory on some places (rest home). That's why I was asking the question, because it happened in my own family. Anyway, you can continue to think right, but you should breath a bit and stop thinking every comments were created to attack you.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

It’s unwise to trust official statistics during a global coup d’etat.

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

Its more a BigPharma/fascism type coup....the govt here spent the whole time trying to scare the hell out of everyone...releasing the mean age of death by/with covid is not scaring anyone...if they were tweaking it they would lower the age not raise it..

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

You may be making an assumption that what was happening was a one off effort.

I always expected it to be a new way of doing things.

The digital totalitarian tyranny first, depopulation second.

However, while establishing the control system, calibrate the killing weapons.

This narrative fits the observations too well to be coincidence, imo

Expand full comment
Triumphant Ape's avatar

I don't understand your statistic, are you saying only older people died?

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

Mean=The average age of a given population.People outside that group died.None under 20 the last time I looked...But not many compared to 60+ and centered around the low 80`s......

Expand full comment
Triumphant Ape's avatar

Perceptually it appears many young (20 to 50) people are dying and getting sick, however I gave up looking for exact numbers because of who provides them most of the time, the same people implementing this fiasco.

Sports figures, celebs dropping dead, turbo cancer in young people, by that I mean rapid aggressive cancers, early onset dementia.

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

Yes I agree

The needles secret is a brilliant book and it explains the mechanism that seems to account for many of these injuries

The shite products are sometimes going into the capillary system as no one bothers to aspirate anymore

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I don’t buy that at all.

If this was a major contribution to the injuries and deaths, this would already be happening with other, routine annual vaccination campaigns, all of which have been known to be utterly fraudulent, ineffective. unnecessary and somewhat dangerous, by all the parties involved except possibly most of the doctors and all of the innocent patients

I also dislike the implication that this book seems to provide plausible deniability for the perpetrators

It might be a contributor but I do not agree with the prominence proposed for it by its author.

Expand full comment
Astragale's avatar

It's worse than not bothering. The 'protocol' people doing the injecting were told to follow was apparently: 'Do not aspirate.'

John Campbell has covered this.

The intention was to get the stuff into the blood.

Expand full comment
Joe Kosugi's avatar

mRNA vaccines can be quickly created and even more quickly tweaked for boosters. They need an EUA(emergency use authorization) to sell them that quickly, and avoid those pesky phase 3 clinical trials. They need to have no other option, so tried and true remedies like antibiotics, Ivermectin, vitamins d and c, antihistamines etc will need to have “shortages” , or be demonized as veterinary medicine. Then the cash cow comes rolling in, a la covid.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

They may be able to create them quickly.

What they cannot do is evaluate their safety and efficacy quickly.

They also cannot be made quickly. Not if you’ve the slightest concern about making reproducible products.

See Hedley Rees on Substack.

The “vaccines” are totally fraudulent.

Their role is for control and to reduce the population.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 4
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Frances's avatar

Personally, overeall, I think humanity is a failed species.

Expand full comment