Fascinating but irrelevant. What we need to know is - why was there an overwhelming concentration on prevention, with no direction on cure (despite multiple attempts of several clinicians to suggest that acquisition of the virus did not matter unless or until it made you ill, which it did only in a small minority).
All the necessary measures were set out in the UK by me in late April 2020. Had they been introduced then, most of the subsequent deaths would have been prevented. My blog sets it all out in diary form in possibly unnecessary detail. See https://bamjiinrye.wordpress.com.
All very well but an equally pressing investigation would be a teratogenic report on the mRNA vaccine platform with a focus on the covid 19 shot. Meaning: "studies of implementing risk management measures when prescribing teratogenic medicines for women of childbearing age and studies reporting risk perceptions of teratogenic medications." I guess it wont be readily funded by state or industry though.
I believe this is an earnest investigation, but its completely esoteric.
The Covid event was planned and orchestrated at the highest levels of power within the world and coordinated by the WEF, WHO and associated governments and private industry. Its comical to read this blathering about "ethical guidance".
This was a psyop to get the mNRA shot into as much of the world as possible.
The current EXCESSIVE all cause deaths for 22 and 23 has already exceeded the deaths from the virus. Of course we also know the treatment of Remdisivir and ventilators killed more that doing nothing and was undertaken to increase the fear and uptake of the shot. Remember this was also done simultaneously while restricting outpatient treatment with antibiotics, steroids, vitamin D, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine which all proved to dramatically improve outcomes of patients.
It looks like coordinated mass murder, ethical guidance notwithstanding.
Estranho como não se fala na causa efeito, uma vez que não conseguem cientificamente provar a dita causa efeito, sugeria que o Panda não colocasse a cabeça na areia e convidasse Christine Massey, a qual é uma Bioestatística Canadense, tendo vários Fois, mostrando que não há um país sequer, que consiga provar cientificamente os "vírus".
I’m a little at odds with this review of what happened with regards to ethics considerations during the last few years of public health histrionics as it in some ways comes across as a ‘well it wasn’t the ethicists’ fault, they just weren’t being listened to’ because my entire impression throughout the debacle was that it was more that what is known as modern ethics is simply not traditional ethics. I got the impression that everyone involved in including ethics professionals & establishment human rights experts all believed they were being impressively ethical, to such an impressive level in fact that they felt justified in rolling their eyes & tut-tutting in disgust at those who they believed were the stupid uneducated people screaming about their policies.
I’m sure the Nazis also felt that their actions were ethically & morally beyond reproach.
I now feel like I have read all this stuff - or variants on the same theme - numerous times over the past couple of years and what it amounts to is that elite technocrats think that they know best for each of us, rather than each of us being able to decide for ourselves. Incidentally, the Bennett Institute at the University of Oxford is also backed by the Wellcome Trust:
Fascinating but irrelevant. What we need to know is - why was there an overwhelming concentration on prevention, with no direction on cure (despite multiple attempts of several clinicians to suggest that acquisition of the virus did not matter unless or until it made you ill, which it did only in a small minority).
All the necessary measures were set out in the UK by me in late April 2020. Had they been introduced then, most of the subsequent deaths would have been prevented. My blog sets it all out in diary form in possibly unnecessary detail. See https://bamjiinrye.wordpress.com.
All very well but an equally pressing investigation would be a teratogenic report on the mRNA vaccine platform with a focus on the covid 19 shot. Meaning: "studies of implementing risk management measures when prescribing teratogenic medicines for women of childbearing age and studies reporting risk perceptions of teratogenic medications." I guess it wont be readily funded by state or industry though.
I believe this is an earnest investigation, but its completely esoteric.
The Covid event was planned and orchestrated at the highest levels of power within the world and coordinated by the WEF, WHO and associated governments and private industry. Its comical to read this blathering about "ethical guidance".
This was a psyop to get the mNRA shot into as much of the world as possible.
The current EXCESSIVE all cause deaths for 22 and 23 has already exceeded the deaths from the virus. Of course we also know the treatment of Remdisivir and ventilators killed more that doing nothing and was undertaken to increase the fear and uptake of the shot. Remember this was also done simultaneously while restricting outpatient treatment with antibiotics, steroids, vitamin D, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine which all proved to dramatically improve outcomes of patients.
It looks like coordinated mass murder, ethical guidance notwithstanding.
Estranho como não se fala na causa efeito, uma vez que não conseguem cientificamente provar a dita causa efeito, sugeria que o Panda não colocasse a cabeça na areia e convidasse Christine Massey, a qual é uma Bioestatística Canadense, tendo vários Fois, mostrando que não há um país sequer, que consiga provar cientificamente os "vírus".
Strange how MEAG was form just 4 months before CoNvid hit the headlines. Coincidence? I think not.
I’m a little at odds with this review of what happened with regards to ethics considerations during the last few years of public health histrionics as it in some ways comes across as a ‘well it wasn’t the ethicists’ fault, they just weren’t being listened to’ because my entire impression throughout the debacle was that it was more that what is known as modern ethics is simply not traditional ethics. I got the impression that everyone involved in including ethics professionals & establishment human rights experts all believed they were being impressively ethical, to such an impressive level in fact that they felt justified in rolling their eyes & tut-tutting in disgust at those who they believed were the stupid uneducated people screaming about their policies.
I’m sure the Nazis also felt that their actions were ethically & morally beyond reproach.
I now feel like I have read all this stuff - or variants on the same theme - numerous times over the past couple of years and what it amounts to is that elite technocrats think that they know best for each of us, rather than each of us being able to decide for ourselves. Incidentally, the Bennett Institute at the University of Oxford is also backed by the Wellcome Trust:
https://warwickvegan.substack.com/p/bad-pharma