Moderna experienced a substantial financial shift in the first quarter (Q1) of 2024, reporting a net loss of $1.2bn - a stark contrast to its net income of $79m in Q1 2023. For the three months ending 31 March, total revenue was $167m - a dramatic decrease from $1.9bn in the corresponding period of 2023.
I understand, with no documentary confirmation, that Moderna was supported by or a creature of the CIA. In which case financial results are almost irrelevant.
I live in the land of mining pump-and-dump promotion, so seeing the insiders harvest their profits two years ago just looks like business as usual. The odd mining accident gets wide press coverage and kills 20 to 60 men, the mRNA scam gets press adulation for foresight and safety!
Bill Gates invested heavily in Moderna stock before SARS-2 was evan heard of because obviously he was given the heads up before the widely advertised "pandemic" began.
Rishi Sunak also made about 500 million using the same strategy.
In January 2020 the stock price was around $20. It rose to a high of $449 in September 2021 so please don't tell me that this is irrelevant. The insiders made out like bandits.
In the spring of 2020 I drove around and Looked at hospital emergency room entrances and parking lots. Most nearly empty and no lines or really many people in the tented areas at the entrances set up for triage.
Your question about the dead bodies in nyc is interesting. There should be funeral home and/ or cemetery records too.
The death data is correct. You cant fake death records. This article somehow wants to question the data, rather than the reality of what happened in NY, CT, PA, NJ, MI, CA. These 6 states accounted for 50% of all Covid deaths. They all happened in this same timeframe (it wasn't just NY). They all sent infected patients into nursing homes and then basically killed them with Remdisivir and ventilators. This is not a data issue. Its a protocol that killed innocents, to create hysteria and justify the push for "vaccines" and lock downs.
I've not read all the comments associated with this piece and so my apologies if anybody else has already raised what I am about to suggest.
If the data are indeed correct then :-
1) The numbers should be verifiable from the Death Certificates issued, and
2) The Funeral Directors in the city willl have see an increase in trade. More burials, more cremations.
If one, or other, or both of those have NOT occured, then the data must be fabricated - likely to just promote the notion that there was a 'pandemic' and it was causing these deaths, pushing folk to clamour for the life saving quack-cines.
If the above two conditions confirm the ivrease in mortality, then that is even more disturbing. Without an increase in admissions to hospital, or an increase in ER visits, it implies (as the article suggests) that folk already in the hospitals were dying from something, and since 'it' affected all age groups simultaneously then it can not have been 'ConVid' or anything else tha would have had a differing mortaility rate between age cohorts.
It's unpalatable to consider, but.... IF the data are correct, AND confirmed by (1) & (2) above, then we must consider that these people may have been murdered by the very service that was tasked with keeping them alive.
Was this NYC 2020 event a trial-run for a more widespread planned extermination, with 'covid deaths' as the cover story?
1) NY law does not permit the release of death certificates under FOI request -- which is one of many reasons New York City makes a very good location for staging a pandemic. In my opinion, government has no right to privatized vital records which We the People charge them with stewarding on our behalf. They do not own the records and the fact of someone's death isn't a private matter.
2) Correct, but this information has been hard to come by. State data for NYC shows an increase in cremations and burials corresponding with the rise. I have multiple records requests in-progress toward getting at the information in another way. Burials at Hart Island increased, but the city also decreased the time in which a decedent needed to be picked up during the initial "emergency" period. That and general fear would've increased the number of decedents being relegated to a city burial. https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1683454845993332736?s=20
I'm out of my league here, but have a question/thought. Of the USA local jurisdictions you're aware of that had a death spike(s) not unlike NYC's (though, I get it that NYC was more dramatic than any other), are any of them in States with open access to death-certificate (or comparable) records?
Have you done (your thing) with any of them (if there are any) what you wish you could do with New York/NYC? I know you've looked at/analyzed/compared various aspects in various cities/counties, but I don't know if you've done a "simulation" of what you'd like to do with NYC's (unobtainable) death-certificate records (in conjunction with all of your other hard-fought NYC data/analysis). Maybe the effort (if doable) would be too much vs. potential gain (but maybe not...). I surely don't know.
Gosh, I have spent this entire day (unplanned) immersing myself in all this trying to catch up and figure things out (though I was already reasonably well informed on the topic relative to the rest of the people on our planet). I don't expect to have an "eruption" like this again (including deluging you with comments again, Ms. Jessica). It is daunting but I'm interested, but it's also time/attention-prohibitive for me (and, as mentioned, my pertinent professional skills/aptitude and/or knowledge are not, and will never be, at your and the others' level [and I have scant personal/anecdotal info to contribute either]).
I'm glad you've made narrative record of everything (your book is one-third written already). I have no idea how you, and others, are so productive (and able to keep so many zillions of facets top of your minds).
Per the federal data, as for the places people died: 252% increase in hospital inpatient deaths in April 2020 (compared to 2019) in the states where deaths increased the most (NJ, NY, CT & MA); 120% increase in deaths at home; and 244% increase in deaths in nursing homes/long term care. https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2024/1/18/us-death-waves-2020-2021-places-of-death
This is interesting...Jessica I've seen you in JJ Coueys livestream chats before...didn't realize the volume of effort in this matter until now.
Has anyone considered whether there are clues to the methods, scope and scale of potential manipulation that can be inferred from the event 201?? Wouldn't this level of manipulation have to modeled and planned? It couldn't be spontaneous.
The death waves have been positively linked with 5G activation. NYC most definitely manipulated death counts. I have two friends quite high up in the NYC Fire Dept and EMS, both independently confirmed that the news was complete bullshit. Bodies piled up because bodies were not being taken from Elmhurst hospital. No other hospitals reported any of what came out of Elmhurst
Causes of admission to hospitals were moved from one category to another. Where ever the excess death numbers came from, in another category they must be missing.
It's impossible to have a stroke, a heart attack or a broken bone without knowing it and going into a hospital because of convid. It has to be the other way around. So the primary diagnosis of convid, combined with a secondary diagnosis of something else much more severe, like surgical event, is utter nonsense. Those events are not diagnosed randomly. Never ever.
Are all numbers are related to offical citizens? Could it be that, while NYC offered medical assistence free of charge to everyone (to maximize the admissions and convid numbers incentively) that a huge number of unregistered citizens (so called illegales) flooded the hospitals? For many of them this could have been a first unique opportunity to have a medical care free of charge. In this case the numbers would have come from seemingly "nowhere".
"Are all numbers are related to official citizens?"
A very good question. How data is collected and binned is foundational to meaningful analysis.
The authors refer to data access. What is most relevant to this are the costly and meticulous efforts made to prevent that data from being made available.
Perhaps those efforts are a matter of "better to remain silent and have others assume one a fool, than to speak and in doing so, prove their assumption correct."
"US residents" only. The following was copied from the intro on the federal database. The records are gathered from death certs:
The Provisional Multiple Cause of Death database contains mortality and population counts for all U.S. counties. Data are based on death certificates for U.S. residents. Each death certificate contains a single underlying cause of death, up to twenty additional multiple causes, and demographic data. The number of deaths, crude death rates, age-adjusted death rates and 95% confidence intervals for death rates can be obtained by cause of death (4 digit ICD-10 codes, 113 selected causes of death, 130 selected causes of infant death, drug and alcohol related causes of death, injury intent and injury mechanism categories), place of residence or place of death's occurrence (national, region, division, state, and county), age (single-year-of age, 5-year age groups, 10-year age groups and infant age groups), single race categories, Hispanic ethnicity, gender and year. Data are also available by urbanization categories for county, place of death, year, month, week and weekday of death, and whether an autopsy was performed.
" What we do know is that the data that we have been able to obtain (whether from publicly available sources or by freedom of information requests) is incongruent with itself."
I missed this part the first read thru. This is a huge Red flag in the database world. it's to be expected that desperate (i.e. differencing) data sources won't normally fit together easily, they require clean up and re-working but data within it's own silo, it's own source, shouldn't be incongruent unless it's been tampered with and or it's been censored so you didn't get everything; like getting %70 of the pieces to a 1k piece puzzle. You can gain some things form what you could put together but the complete picture is still to missing.
I made this post at the Brownstone Institute email group. (This article was picked up by Brownstone).
I hope everyone reads the article by Jessica Hackett and the Panda writers that questions how so many “Covid deaths” could suddenly happen in a few weeks in New York City. Mr. Spock would be impressed by the logic used to question the veracity of the “authorized narrative.”
The article shows that WHAT supposedly happened (a sudden spike in Covid deaths) could not have “plausibly” happened. It also gives readers a new perspective on ways this faux inflation of “Covid deaths” could have happened (the “How” question).
The authors didn’t have space to get into the question of WHY this occurred, but “why” is usually the best question. While it should matter how the massive inflation of “Covid deaths” happened, all that really matters is that everyone (who matters) came to believe that “Covid” caused this massive spike in deaths.
To me anyway, what this article really shows is that a massive conspiracy occurred (and is still occurring) to dramatically inflate the number of “Covid deaths.” There were dozens of ways this narrative was fraudulently created … followed by on-going cover-ups to conceal how this happened.
To me, the best “why answer” is that a lot of people and organizations clearly wanted to scare the living daylights out of the whole world so they could get mandatory mRNA vaccines. Absent huge spikes in excess deaths (most or all attributed to Covid) these people wouldn’t have gotten what they wanted.
I don’t think most people in healthcare or science wanted huge numbers of people to die, but the fact they got the fear reaction they wanted was probably fine with them.
So hundreds of thousands of people (millions?) went along with the questionable narrative that Covid was causing all these deaths. Significantly, nobody who matters is trying to prove that Covid DIDN'T cause most of these deaths. This, to me, proves that all the important truth-seeking organizations are captured and they don’t really care about exposing the truth or investigating other possible reasons for this spike in deaths.
Why would so many people be adamantly opposed to pursuing the truth?
... The "why question" is also the most disturbing question.
"Why" is always the "best" question when retrospectively analyzing sudden dramatic, unprecedented events. When you follow that thread, in the wider context you get a disturbing bigger picture.
The most disturbing question insofar as the data presented go is, “Did the number of people who are claimed to have died on each day actually die, actually die on those days, and actually die in the settings/places they are claimed to have died (and die once and only once)?”
You can find names, ages and places of death for a small percentage of the claimed deceased on the Hart Island lookup service. Maybe this will uncover something.
New York City is the centre of western power, if you consider that money=power. Washington dances to the NYC tune, and all other centres are lesser players. It is also the centre of media power. On an efficiency basis the creation of a false narrative in NYC makes a lot of sense.
I see two things in your article which I think should be noted:
You state that two buildings were destroyed on 9/11. Do search for the fate of #7, World Trade Center. In your context, the loss of life did occur in the Twin Towers, but for people who didn't notice the destruction of Building 7, you get the same difficulty in informing them of the "irregularities" in the Covid narrative.
Your Fig.13 also shows an interesting feature- the 2021 spike in LA deaths. As a conspiracy theorist I might attribute this to the initial toxic effect of the mRNA injection campaign.
Are there any data from financial or quarterly reports of hospital occupancy in New York in years before 2020 from publicly traded hospital corporations? This would be a key performance metric when reporting to shareholders. HCA, for example, has a NYSE listing, so would at least give a national baseline metric.
Accordingly, we suggested a few possible alternatives, namely “iatrogenic harms, psychological effects, neglect, panic, ventilators and sedatives, and policies….”
That would be a great name for a new medical journal: "Iatrogenic Harms". On its flagship first edition, it could have on its cover a smiling Fauci in a lab coat.
And, for what it’s worth, the “excess deaths” are still far above normal baseline figures pre-2020. My hunch is that the real number of “excess deaths” is somehow still being undercounted via various statistical or reporting mechanisms.
Excess deaths were THE “story” for the first two years of the official pandemic … but now the continued existence of surplus deaths is strangely NOT a story (at least for the mainstream press and our “truth-seeking” official organizations.)
In a recent article, I argue that the “excess deaths” HAD to happen. Without them, we would not have had a “plausible” reason to lockdown society and then compel everyone to get an experimental “vaccine.” In other words, “no excess deaths” = “no New Normal” (a New Normal necessitated by a super contagious, super DEADLY respiratory virus).
It should go without saying that the massive, unprecedented spike in deaths in New York City helped produce the requisite fear/panic narrative that gave us all the madness and unnecessary misery that followed.
I’m grateful a few smart people are highlighting all the logical head-scratchers about these alleged "Covid deaths."
Bill...I kinda think there were no excess deaths in 2020...see Dennis rancourt,,,but I suspect 'they 'had to somehow 'show' excess deaths from covid in the spring of 2020,,...and so that is what NYC numbers 'show'.
I dont know who 'they' are..nor ''why".....but I have suspicions....lots of them....including most of all. $$$$$$$. When stuff happens in NYC....it's generally because someone has figured out how to make a lot of it fast...not legally.
Ps..excess deaths after 12/20 coincide with jab rollout....up to then there were no excess deaths. All spring the sirens wailed even in my small town. Many of the jabbed that died were listed as unjabbed because of the 2 week rule.
Thanks, Bill. In this article, we aren’t focusing on cause of death attribution as much as we are the shape and magnitude of the all cause and setting of death curves.
10-4. It's great research and then you presented your points with perfect Vulcan logic. And what I really like is you are focussing on a subject/theory that no one else has focussed on. A+ for originality! I wonder why none of these points occurred to any journalists or editors at, say, The New York Times.
Fantastic work. Everything we have been told by the experts and public health organizations is "implausible." The data from New York City takes the Implausibility Prize.
Human remains and archaeology: when is it ok to dig up ...
Iceni Projects
https://www.iceniprojects.com › human-remains-and-ar...
26 Feb 2020 — The ethics of how, when and why human remains are excavated to facilitate development is subject to ongoing debate.
Moderna experienced a substantial financial shift in the first quarter (Q1) of 2024, reporting a net loss of $1.2bn - a stark contrast to its net income of $79m in Q1 2023. For the three months ending 31 March, total revenue was $167m - a dramatic decrease from $1.9bn in the corresponding period of 2023.
I understand, with no documentary confirmation, that Moderna was supported by or a creature of the CIA. In which case financial results are almost irrelevant.
I live in the land of mining pump-and-dump promotion, so seeing the insiders harvest their profits two years ago just looks like business as usual. The odd mining accident gets wide press coverage and kills 20 to 60 men, the mRNA scam gets press adulation for foresight and safety!
Bill Gates invested heavily in Moderna stock before SARS-2 was evan heard of because obviously he was given the heads up before the widely advertised "pandemic" began.
Rishi Sunak also made about 500 million using the same strategy.
In January 2020 the stock price was around $20. It rose to a high of $449 in September 2021 so please don't tell me that this is irrelevant. The insiders made out like bandits.
In the spring of 2020 I drove around and Looked at hospital emergency room entrances and parking lots. Most nearly empty and no lines or really many people in the tented areas at the entrances set up for triage.
Your question about the dead bodies in nyc is interesting. There should be funeral home and/ or cemetery records too.
The death data is correct. You cant fake death records. This article somehow wants to question the data, rather than the reality of what happened in NY, CT, PA, NJ, MI, CA. These 6 states accounted for 50% of all Covid deaths. They all happened in this same timeframe (it wasn't just NY). They all sent infected patients into nursing homes and then basically killed them with Remdisivir and ventilators. This is not a data issue. Its a protocol that killed innocents, to create hysteria and justify the push for "vaccines" and lock downs.
I've not read all the comments associated with this piece and so my apologies if anybody else has already raised what I am about to suggest.
If the data are indeed correct then :-
1) The numbers should be verifiable from the Death Certificates issued, and
2) The Funeral Directors in the city willl have see an increase in trade. More burials, more cremations.
If one, or other, or both of those have NOT occured, then the data must be fabricated - likely to just promote the notion that there was a 'pandemic' and it was causing these deaths, pushing folk to clamour for the life saving quack-cines.
If the above two conditions confirm the ivrease in mortality, then that is even more disturbing. Without an increase in admissions to hospital, or an increase in ER visits, it implies (as the article suggests) that folk already in the hospitals were dying from something, and since 'it' affected all age groups simultaneously then it can not have been 'ConVid' or anything else tha would have had a differing mortaility rate between age cohorts.
It's unpalatable to consider, but.... IF the data are correct, AND confirmed by (1) & (2) above, then we must consider that these people may have been murdered by the very service that was tasked with keeping them alive.
Was this NYC 2020 event a trial-run for a more widespread planned extermination, with 'covid deaths' as the cover story?
Thanks for your interest.
1) NY law does not permit the release of death certificates under FOI request -- which is one of many reasons New York City makes a very good location for staging a pandemic. In my opinion, government has no right to privatized vital records which We the People charge them with stewarding on our behalf. They do not own the records and the fact of someone's death isn't a private matter.
2) Correct, but this information has been hard to come by. State data for NYC shows an increase in cremations and burials corresponding with the rise. I have multiple records requests in-progress toward getting at the information in another way. Burials at Hart Island increased, but the city also decreased the time in which a decedent needed to be picked up during the initial "emergency" period. That and general fear would've increased the number of decedents being relegated to a city burial. https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1683454845993332736?s=20
I'm out of my league here, but have a question/thought. Of the USA local jurisdictions you're aware of that had a death spike(s) not unlike NYC's (though, I get it that NYC was more dramatic than any other), are any of them in States with open access to death-certificate (or comparable) records?
Have you done (your thing) with any of them (if there are any) what you wish you could do with New York/NYC? I know you've looked at/analyzed/compared various aspects in various cities/counties, but I don't know if you've done a "simulation" of what you'd like to do with NYC's (unobtainable) death-certificate records (in conjunction with all of your other hard-fought NYC data/analysis). Maybe the effort (if doable) would be too much vs. potential gain (but maybe not...). I surely don't know.
Gosh, I have spent this entire day (unplanned) immersing myself in all this trying to catch up and figure things out (though I was already reasonably well informed on the topic relative to the rest of the people on our planet). I don't expect to have an "eruption" like this again (including deluging you with comments again, Ms. Jessica). It is daunting but I'm interested, but it's also time/attention-prohibitive for me (and, as mentioned, my pertinent professional skills/aptitude and/or knowledge are not, and will never be, at your and the others' level [and I have scant personal/anecdotal info to contribute either]).
I'm glad you've made narrative record of everything (your book is one-third written already). I have no idea how you, and others, are so productive (and able to keep so many zillions of facets top of your minds).
P.S. You are likely well aware of this very informative website, but if not, I'm dropping it off here: https://staterecords.org/vital/death
Per the federal data, as for the places people died: 252% increase in hospital inpatient deaths in April 2020 (compared to 2019) in the states where deaths increased the most (NJ, NY, CT & MA); 120% increase in deaths at home; and 244% increase in deaths in nursing homes/long term care. https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2024/1/18/us-death-waves-2020-2021-places-of-death
Got to be fake data put out there as a scare tactic
5G
This is interesting...Jessica I've seen you in JJ Coueys livestream chats before...didn't realize the volume of effort in this matter until now.
Has anyone considered whether there are clues to the methods, scope and scale of potential manipulation that can be inferred from the event 201?? Wouldn't this level of manipulation have to modeled and planned? It couldn't be spontaneous.
Event 201 was, in my opinion, merely the icing on a cake.
A final "readiness" activity for elites.
It was the last full script review before the curtain went up
The death waves have been positively linked with 5G activation. NYC most definitely manipulated death counts. I have two friends quite high up in the NYC Fire Dept and EMS, both independently confirmed that the news was complete bullshit. Bodies piled up because bodies were not being taken from Elmhurst hospital. No other hospitals reported any of what came out of Elmhurst
PANDA team, Can I repost the Hospital Activity graph with a minor modification to it?
Causes of admission to hospitals were moved from one category to another. Where ever the excess death numbers came from, in another category they must be missing.
It's impossible to have a stroke, a heart attack or a broken bone without knowing it and going into a hospital because of convid. It has to be the other way around. So the primary diagnosis of convid, combined with a secondary diagnosis of something else much more severe, like surgical event, is utter nonsense. Those events are not diagnosed randomly. Never ever.
Are all numbers are related to offical citizens? Could it be that, while NYC offered medical assistence free of charge to everyone (to maximize the admissions and convid numbers incentively) that a huge number of unregistered citizens (so called illegales) flooded the hospitals? For many of them this could have been a first unique opportunity to have a medical care free of charge. In this case the numbers would have come from seemingly "nowhere".
Per the federal data, a lot of the excess deaths were NOT attributed to 'COVID19', but rather to range of other causes. So even the official data does not support the official narrative. That applies to all the death waves in 2020 and 2021, not just NYC. https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2024/2/3/us-death-peaks-2020-2021-multiple-causes-of-death
"Are all numbers are related to official citizens?"
A very good question. How data is collected and binned is foundational to meaningful analysis.
The authors refer to data access. What is most relevant to this are the costly and meticulous efforts made to prevent that data from being made available.
Perhaps those efforts are a matter of "better to remain silent and have others assume one a fool, than to speak and in doing so, prove their assumption correct."
"US residents" only. The following was copied from the intro on the federal database. The records are gathered from death certs:
The Provisional Multiple Cause of Death database contains mortality and population counts for all U.S. counties. Data are based on death certificates for U.S. residents. Each death certificate contains a single underlying cause of death, up to twenty additional multiple causes, and demographic data. The number of deaths, crude death rates, age-adjusted death rates and 95% confidence intervals for death rates can be obtained by cause of death (4 digit ICD-10 codes, 113 selected causes of death, 130 selected causes of infant death, drug and alcohol related causes of death, injury intent and injury mechanism categories), place of residence or place of death's occurrence (national, region, division, state, and county), age (single-year-of age, 5-year age groups, 10-year age groups and infant age groups), single race categories, Hispanic ethnicity, gender and year. Data are also available by urbanization categories for county, place of death, year, month, week and weekday of death, and whether an autopsy was performed.
" What we do know is that the data that we have been able to obtain (whether from publicly available sources or by freedom of information requests) is incongruent with itself."
I missed this part the first read thru. This is a huge Red flag in the database world. it's to be expected that desperate (i.e. differencing) data sources won't normally fit together easily, they require clean up and re-working but data within it's own silo, it's own source, shouldn't be incongruent unless it's been tampered with and or it's been censored so you didn't get everything; like getting %70 of the pieces to a 1k piece puzzle. You can gain some things form what you could put together but the complete picture is still to missing.
I made this post at the Brownstone Institute email group. (This article was picked up by Brownstone).
I hope everyone reads the article by Jessica Hackett and the Panda writers that questions how so many “Covid deaths” could suddenly happen in a few weeks in New York City. Mr. Spock would be impressed by the logic used to question the veracity of the “authorized narrative.”
The article shows that WHAT supposedly happened (a sudden spike in Covid deaths) could not have “plausibly” happened. It also gives readers a new perspective on ways this faux inflation of “Covid deaths” could have happened (the “How” question).
The authors didn’t have space to get into the question of WHY this occurred, but “why” is usually the best question. While it should matter how the massive inflation of “Covid deaths” happened, all that really matters is that everyone (who matters) came to believe that “Covid” caused this massive spike in deaths.
To me anyway, what this article really shows is that a massive conspiracy occurred (and is still occurring) to dramatically inflate the number of “Covid deaths.” There were dozens of ways this narrative was fraudulently created … followed by on-going cover-ups to conceal how this happened.
To me, the best “why answer” is that a lot of people and organizations clearly wanted to scare the living daylights out of the whole world so they could get mandatory mRNA vaccines. Absent huge spikes in excess deaths (most or all attributed to Covid) these people wouldn’t have gotten what they wanted.
I don’t think most people in healthcare or science wanted huge numbers of people to die, but the fact they got the fear reaction they wanted was probably fine with them.
So hundreds of thousands of people (millions?) went along with the questionable narrative that Covid was causing all these deaths. Significantly, nobody who matters is trying to prove that Covid DIDN'T cause most of these deaths. This, to me, proves that all the important truth-seeking organizations are captured and they don’t really care about exposing the truth or investigating other possible reasons for this spike in deaths.
Why would so many people be adamantly opposed to pursuing the truth?
... The "why question" is also the most disturbing question.
"Why" is always the "best" question when retrospectively analyzing sudden dramatic, unprecedented events. When you follow that thread, in the wider context you get a disturbing bigger picture.
The most disturbing question insofar as the data presented go is, “Did the number of people who are claimed to have died on each day actually die, actually die on those days, and actually die in the settings/places they are claimed to have died (and die once and only once)?”
You can find names, ages and places of death for a small percentage of the claimed deceased on the Hart Island lookup service. Maybe this will uncover something.
https://a073-hartisland-web.nyc.gov/hartisland/pages/home/home.jsf
And that question COULD be answered (fairly easily, it seems to me).
Yep. We are not talking about some unknowable, unprovable question for which no records exist.
Trouble is, in the event of such fraud/manipulation in NYC, there would be no reason to believe it was limited to that one City.
Exceptions prove the rules.
New York City is the centre of western power, if you consider that money=power. Washington dances to the NYC tune, and all other centres are lesser players. It is also the centre of media power. On an efficiency basis the creation of a false narrative in NYC makes a lot of sense.
I see two things in your article which I think should be noted:
You state that two buildings were destroyed on 9/11. Do search for the fate of #7, World Trade Center. In your context, the loss of life did occur in the Twin Towers, but for people who didn't notice the destruction of Building 7, you get the same difficulty in informing them of the "irregularities" in the Covid narrative.
Your Fig.13 also shows an interesting feature- the 2021 spike in LA deaths. As a conspiracy theorist I might attribute this to the initial toxic effect of the mRNA injection campaign.
Are there any data from financial or quarterly reports of hospital occupancy in New York in years before 2020 from publicly traded hospital corporations? This would be a key performance metric when reporting to shareholders. HCA, for example, has a NYSE listing, so would at least give a national baseline metric.
Thank you for this very powerful article.
Accordingly, we suggested a few possible alternatives, namely “iatrogenic harms, psychological effects, neglect, panic, ventilators and sedatives, and policies….”
That would be a great name for a new medical journal: "Iatrogenic Harms". On its flagship first edition, it could have on its cover a smiling Fauci in a lab coat.
And, for what it’s worth, the “excess deaths” are still far above normal baseline figures pre-2020. My hunch is that the real number of “excess deaths” is somehow still being undercounted via various statistical or reporting mechanisms.
Excess deaths were THE “story” for the first two years of the official pandemic … but now the continued existence of surplus deaths is strangely NOT a story (at least for the mainstream press and our “truth-seeking” official organizations.)
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/why-excess-deaths-cant-be-a-story?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
In a recent article, I argue that the “excess deaths” HAD to happen. Without them, we would not have had a “plausible” reason to lockdown society and then compel everyone to get an experimental “vaccine.” In other words, “no excess deaths” = “no New Normal” (a New Normal necessitated by a super contagious, super DEADLY respiratory virus).
It should go without saying that the massive, unprecedented spike in deaths in New York City helped produce the requisite fear/panic narrative that gave us all the madness and unnecessary misery that followed.
I’m grateful a few smart people are highlighting all the logical head-scratchers about these alleged "Covid deaths."
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-pandemics-start-date-had-to-be?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Bill...I kinda think there were no excess deaths in 2020...see Dennis rancourt,,,but I suspect 'they 'had to somehow 'show' excess deaths from covid in the spring of 2020,,...and so that is what NYC numbers 'show'.
I dont know who 'they' are..nor ''why".....but I have suspicions....lots of them....including most of all. $$$$$$$. When stuff happens in NYC....it's generally because someone has figured out how to make a lot of it fast...not legally.
Ps..excess deaths after 12/20 coincide with jab rollout....up to then there were no excess deaths. All spring the sirens wailed even in my small town. Many of the jabbed that died were listed as unjabbed because of the 2 week rule.
Thanks, Bill. In this article, we aren’t focusing on cause of death attribution as much as we are the shape and magnitude of the all cause and setting of death curves.
10-4. It's great research and then you presented your points with perfect Vulcan logic. And what I really like is you are focussing on a subject/theory that no one else has focussed on. A+ for originality! I wonder why none of these points occurred to any journalists or editors at, say, The New York Times.
Because they profited greatly from the “Novel Virus Attacked New York But New York Fought Back and Defeated Novel Virus” narrative.
Indeed, they were co-authors.
Fantastic work. Everything we have been told by the experts and public health organizations is "implausible." The data from New York City takes the Implausibility Prize.