Just read 'The Real Anthony Fauci' to find out how safe and effective FDA aoproved vaccines and treatments are. Why isnt he in prison or dangling from a rope?
If you want to test the idea that clinicians are well-informed, ask one to explain the difference between RRR and ARR. He probably can't even tell you what those letters stand for.
With the possible exceptions of the FBI and CIA, whose employees enjoy a revolving door between DC and Silicon Valley, the FDA is the most captured regulatory agency in world history. I'll tell you what made me, an enthusiastic vaccine proponent in December, 2019, take a second look at vaccine effectiveness and then do a 180 on the whole idea: the FDA. The non-stop lying from the FDA.
Besides the importance of knowing both ARR and RRR when evaluating a vaccine's effectiveness, here's what the FDA will tell no one: The injections, as products that exist under EUA rules, are exempt from "safety regulations governing [their] manufacture, shipment, holding, dispensing, administration, and labeling." "No federal or state agency assures that the contents of the batch of Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine...has similar contents to any other batch...making any practical determination of the safety" of a given dose "impossible," according to Katherine Watt. How many people would have rolled up their sleeves if the FDA had been honest about that? How many FDA employees would still get cushy gigs at a pharma giant if they'd been honest about that? How many people would have taken the injections if they'd known that in 2019 HHS "suspended all previously enforceable rules pertaining to independent testing, site inspections, and regulatory compliance" for anything granted EUA status?
The FDA is run and staffed by liars, and that includes the two tools who produced the propaganda that JAMA ran. They have no one but themselves to blame for destroying trust in the agency and in vaccines.
Excellent article! Thank you again for your great work! I would suggest you are being optimistic about regaining public trust. It is one of those necessary fragile social contracts that are hard to build and easy to break. The public that realizes the FDA lied about Covid vaccines will not immediately trust them upon a single truthful statement because trust is not about 80% or 90% coverage. Similarly, a public that realizes that the FDA has lied repeatedly over time about many vaccines will not regain trust this generation. Count me in the latter.
Thanks for the solid takedown of this farcical report. I will never get another injection of any kind, ever, and will spend the rest of my life discouraging folks from getting them as well.
Many thanks for this masterpiece rebuttal. It's indeed possible that the authors are plegged by conflicts of interest. On top of that, their biggest issue is to admit to themselves and to others how wrong they were and still are. That's an EGO killer that they would not survive in their position.
Some omissions. DoD Military Industrial Complex run the democide show and the legislation has been sneakily changed over decades to allow these "countermeasures" to be foisted on the world using Other Transactional Authority (OTA) without ANY quality control as per Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova work. CDC and FDA, corrupt as they are, are glove puppets. The Financial incentives for Russian Roulette murdering are the spoonful of sugar that makes the medicine go down. Our legislators are complicit. Even Rand Paul's wife bought Gilead shares early in this shitshow.
Thanks for this line up. So much damage was done to people's lives. And 90% does not even know what caused their misery. Can only hope that more people wake to to reality by reading articles like these.
Never took a single Covid shot, and no flu shot either.
Circumventing adequate research on efficacy and safety studies in the name of fast track development and obtaining emergency use authorization has been one of the hall mark of the covid vaccine development. Especially when the therapeutic intervention is intended for such a larger scale administration. To add to the misery, simply repurposing a previously failed method of therapeutic intervention like the mRNA lipid nano particle and hacking the cellular homeostasis of the host body to produce indiscriminate amount of single antigen called the spike protein. All of this to simply scale up the production of the so called vaccine/antigen with a known pathological potential but an unknown immune response. Overall a flawed method of vaccination under the pretext of an overestimated and falsely projected health risk and fatality rate, has been endorsed by the highly corrupt global institutions of health regulations in collusion with the industry. With a single most objective of monetising and creating a pathway for such false health emergencies in future.
While I applaud this effort, it is vital to point out here that so-called ‘hesitancy’ with regard to childhood vaccination goes far beyond Covid. All of the issues called out in the response are good points, but the response plays into the framing preferred by Marks and Califf. The elephant in the room is ignored. The CDC pediatric schedule is nothing less than egregious and outrageous. The problems go *well* beyond just the Covid shots. This isn’t lost on innumerable parents, many of whom have gone down the rabbit hole and found the CDC’s evidence for safety and efficacy to be sorely wanting. The basis for the *entire* schedule is in question.
Absolutely intuitively I felt something was wrong about this vaccine and I consider myself so lucky to have had an NHS Doctor who spoke to me about the genuine risks of covid and the Vaccine which made me decide to not take the vaccine. Since then I have seen so many people become ill some getting covid heart irregularities and even Cancer I definitely dodged a bullet and I have since researched big pharmas corruption of health care and how prescription drugs are now the third biggest killer in western countries.
"Despite... [vaccines] clear and compelling benefit of saving individual lives and improving population health outcomes"
I'm frustrated with these broad statements of "known fact" - has population health really improved?
Thank you for your article...but I feel you missed this point...though that is a book on its own.
The alleged "vaccine hesitancy" is leading to people question the entire medical system is not new thing. I'm currently reading 1908 article, 100 years (or so) ago, where there was the same widespread mis-trust in the medical profession by laity as well as their own orthodox practitioners ....history is repeating itself. I hope to stack on this soon.
Curiously 1908 was the same time that the Carnegie Foundation funded Abraham Flexner took over the AMA's medical education reform project. This was after publication of Flexners 1907 "little book" where he noted a “splendid opportunity thus awaits a school outside the present system”. An "opportunity" for a great reset.
They knowingly lied and in my humble opinion there is a whole bunch around the world who need to be charged with crimes against humanity...mass and deliberate murder, something that is still ongoing on with these maggots in their pursuit of the depopulation agenda! I have no pity for them none!
Claim number 3 is largely correct, concerning the lack of vaccinations in under developed countries. Professor Benn from Denmark has spent decades studying the non-specific effects of vaccines (these are the effects of vaccinations other than the target disease). The evidence is considerable and consistent; live attenuated vaccines, eg measles, save childrens' lives over and above the benefit from the protection against the target disease. This has been shown in both developed and underdeveloped countries. The reverse is true for killed vaccines. There is a discussion of these concepts in relation to Covid vaccines in the Lancet (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00498-4/fulltext#%20)
Just read 'The Real Anthony Fauci' to find out how safe and effective FDA aoproved vaccines and treatments are. Why isnt he in prison or dangling from a rope?
If you want to test the idea that clinicians are well-informed, ask one to explain the difference between RRR and ARR. He probably can't even tell you what those letters stand for.
With the possible exceptions of the FBI and CIA, whose employees enjoy a revolving door between DC and Silicon Valley, the FDA is the most captured regulatory agency in world history. I'll tell you what made me, an enthusiastic vaccine proponent in December, 2019, take a second look at vaccine effectiveness and then do a 180 on the whole idea: the FDA. The non-stop lying from the FDA.
Besides the importance of knowing both ARR and RRR when evaluating a vaccine's effectiveness, here's what the FDA will tell no one: The injections, as products that exist under EUA rules, are exempt from "safety regulations governing [their] manufacture, shipment, holding, dispensing, administration, and labeling." "No federal or state agency assures that the contents of the batch of Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine...has similar contents to any other batch...making any practical determination of the safety" of a given dose "impossible," according to Katherine Watt. How many people would have rolled up their sleeves if the FDA had been honest about that? How many FDA employees would still get cushy gigs at a pharma giant if they'd been honest about that? How many people would have taken the injections if they'd known that in 2019 HHS "suspended all previously enforceable rules pertaining to independent testing, site inspections, and regulatory compliance" for anything granted EUA status?
The FDA is run and staffed by liars, and that includes the two tools who produced the propaganda that JAMA ran. They have no one but themselves to blame for destroying trust in the agency and in vaccines.
https://open.substack.com/pub/democracymanifest/p/the-countermeasures-coup?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b7m4j further to my earlier comment, this is illuminating
Excellent article! Thank you again for your great work! I would suggest you are being optimistic about regaining public trust. It is one of those necessary fragile social contracts that are hard to build and easy to break. The public that realizes the FDA lied about Covid vaccines will not immediately trust them upon a single truthful statement because trust is not about 80% or 90% coverage. Similarly, a public that realizes that the FDA has lied repeatedly over time about many vaccines will not regain trust this generation. Count me in the latter.
Thanks for the solid takedown of this farcical report. I will never get another injection of any kind, ever, and will spend the rest of my life discouraging folks from getting them as well.
Many thanks for this masterpiece rebuttal. It's indeed possible that the authors are plegged by conflicts of interest. On top of that, their biggest issue is to admit to themselves and to others how wrong they were and still are. That's an EGO killer that they would not survive in their position.
Some omissions. DoD Military Industrial Complex run the democide show and the legislation has been sneakily changed over decades to allow these "countermeasures" to be foisted on the world using Other Transactional Authority (OTA) without ANY quality control as per Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova work. CDC and FDA, corrupt as they are, are glove puppets. The Financial incentives for Russian Roulette murdering are the spoonful of sugar that makes the medicine go down. Our legislators are complicit. Even Rand Paul's wife bought Gilead shares early in this shitshow.
Thanks for this line up. So much damage was done to people's lives. And 90% does not even know what caused their misery. Can only hope that more people wake to to reality by reading articles like these.
Never took a single Covid shot, and no flu shot either.
Circumventing adequate research on efficacy and safety studies in the name of fast track development and obtaining emergency use authorization has been one of the hall mark of the covid vaccine development. Especially when the therapeutic intervention is intended for such a larger scale administration. To add to the misery, simply repurposing a previously failed method of therapeutic intervention like the mRNA lipid nano particle and hacking the cellular homeostasis of the host body to produce indiscriminate amount of single antigen called the spike protein. All of this to simply scale up the production of the so called vaccine/antigen with a known pathological potential but an unknown immune response. Overall a flawed method of vaccination under the pretext of an overestimated and falsely projected health risk and fatality rate, has been endorsed by the highly corrupt global institutions of health regulations in collusion with the industry. With a single most objective of monetising and creating a pathway for such false health emergencies in future.
While I applaud this effort, it is vital to point out here that so-called ‘hesitancy’ with regard to childhood vaccination goes far beyond Covid. All of the issues called out in the response are good points, but the response plays into the framing preferred by Marks and Califf. The elephant in the room is ignored. The CDC pediatric schedule is nothing less than egregious and outrageous. The problems go *well* beyond just the Covid shots. This isn’t lost on innumerable parents, many of whom have gone down the rabbit hole and found the CDC’s evidence for safety and efficacy to be sorely wanting. The basis for the *entire* schedule is in question.
Absolutely intuitively I felt something was wrong about this vaccine and I consider myself so lucky to have had an NHS Doctor who spoke to me about the genuine risks of covid and the Vaccine which made me decide to not take the vaccine. Since then I have seen so many people become ill some getting covid heart irregularities and even Cancer I definitely dodged a bullet and I have since researched big pharmas corruption of health care and how prescription drugs are now the third biggest killer in western countries.
I can't get past this first part of claim 1:
"Despite... [vaccines] clear and compelling benefit of saving individual lives and improving population health outcomes"
I'm frustrated with these broad statements of "known fact" - has population health really improved?
Thank you for your article...but I feel you missed this point...though that is a book on its own.
The alleged "vaccine hesitancy" is leading to people question the entire medical system is not new thing. I'm currently reading 1908 article, 100 years (or so) ago, where there was the same widespread mis-trust in the medical profession by laity as well as their own orthodox practitioners ....history is repeating itself. I hope to stack on this soon.
Curiously 1908 was the same time that the Carnegie Foundation funded Abraham Flexner took over the AMA's medical education reform project. This was after publication of Flexners 1907 "little book" where he noted a “splendid opportunity thus awaits a school outside the present system”. An "opportunity" for a great reset.
https://totalityofevidence.com/timeline/the-flexner-report/
Viruses Don’t Exist and Why It Matters - (Dr. Sam Bailey) http://tinyurl.com/3abdtfzj
They knowingly lied and in my humble opinion there is a whole bunch around the world who need to be charged with crimes against humanity...mass and deliberate murder, something that is still ongoing on with these maggots in their pursuit of the depopulation agenda! I have no pity for them none!
You could use also the strange meanders of the Flumist as a proof that vaccines are marketed despite being ineffective for all age groups.
Please compare this news by NPR (sic!) https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/06/27/483706023/how-flumist-slipped-from-preferred-to-passe
with this Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_attenuated_influenza_vaccine
Another interesting story can be found here
https://wa.kaiserpermanente.org/static/healthAndWellness/flu/flu-mist.pdf
Claim number 3 is largely correct, concerning the lack of vaccinations in under developed countries. Professor Benn from Denmark has spent decades studying the non-specific effects of vaccines (these are the effects of vaccinations other than the target disease). The evidence is considerable and consistent; live attenuated vaccines, eg measles, save childrens' lives over and above the benefit from the protection against the target disease. This has been shown in both developed and underdeveloped countries. The reverse is true for killed vaccines. There is a discussion of these concepts in relation to Covid vaccines in the Lancet (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00498-4/fulltext#%20)