As a retired journalist myself, I theorise that the great silence has less to do with direct financial interests than with the general desire of journalists to Do Good, or at least to be seen to be doing it. The political polarisation of covid, and the early arguments about what constituted altruism, have both been enormously influential. And then one needs to consider that almost all journalists are innumerate and scientifically illiterate.
Well written Nick, thank you for your honesty and bravery. By my own observation within my circles it seems that those that got CV before the vaccine were better off than those that got the vaccine then Covid. Maybe one of the reasons Sweden did better even though they also eventually rolled out the vaccine. It seems that the vaccine was not as damaging to those that already had acquired naturally immunity but this is only based on personal observation. Keep up the good work against a level of Evil the world has never seen
Can you imagine what intellectually honest, scientifically curious people would find by starting with a hypothesis that Covid the Virus Itself caused almost none of the excess death instead of assuming it caused most of it?
(I can, and so can you, Nick - which is how we know it will be a long time before anyone breaks omertà.)
"Six recent “Covid” deaths, per the Milwaukee coroner’s office"
Please take a good look at the 100% "Covid" deaths. It is that way since the fraud started and they still keep going with it.
You won't find a conscience in those with power "surely someone is going to locate a conscience and break ranks?". Sorry Mr. Hudson, it simply is that way. You remember Mr. Snowden? He found his conscience but what did he change? Nothing. Mr. Manning? Nothing. The criminals (politicians, soldiers, agents, ... are still in office or enjoy there pension while Snowden will never see his home again and Manning will most likely die in prison.
Don't know if the above link works. If not then look at the BBC website. The heading of the article is "Dying patient should have been seen in person".
26 year old man died when an ear infection turned into a fatal abscess on his brainstem. His GP surgery refused to see him 4 times and even cancelled a blood test in case he had covid.
The BBC don't mind reporting these sort of "tragedies" but won't delve into whether this shows lockdowns and withdrawal of services was a good idea.
It's not investigative journalism because Ofcom told them they weren't to investigate anything to do with the whole pandemic response. So they haven't. Which is depressing. I watched that film about the Washington Post the other day - that's the sort of journalism needed. Sadly, the Post is just as bad as all the others now.
Excellent thanks. Also we mustn't forget that all or nearly all mainstream reporters as well as their bosses will have almost certainly been 'vaccinated' themselves, so a level of denial is probably natural. It'd be one thing for them to report the 'vaccines' are simply ineffective but perhaps another to admit they might cause future harms not yet revealed, meaning those same reporters might be in for a similar fate themselves some time in the future. In that scenario a "head in the sand" attitute is probably understandable in a way, rather than facing up to what might happen over which they have no control
As a retired journalist myself, I theorise that the great silence has less to do with direct financial interests than with the general desire of journalists to Do Good, or at least to be seen to be doing it. The political polarisation of covid, and the early arguments about what constituted altruism, have both been enormously influential. And then one needs to consider that almost all journalists are innumerate and scientifically illiterate.
Well written Nick, thank you for your honesty and bravery. By my own observation within my circles it seems that those that got CV before the vaccine were better off than those that got the vaccine then Covid. Maybe one of the reasons Sweden did better even though they also eventually rolled out the vaccine. It seems that the vaccine was not as damaging to those that already had acquired naturally immunity but this is only based on personal observation. Keep up the good work against a level of Evil the world has never seen
#Faucism = #omertà #CodeOfSilence #MedicalTyranny #MedicalMafia #MedicalBoards = #GreatReset = #Amerika
At this point, even if the mainstream media and medical journals started reporting the truth about what just happened, I wouldn't believe them.
Can you imagine what intellectually honest, scientifically curious people would find by starting with a hypothesis that Covid the Virus Itself caused almost none of the excess death instead of assuming it caused most of it?
(I can, and so can you, Nick - which is how we know it will be a long time before anyone breaks omertà.)
-> "check's in the mail"
-> "just the tip"
-> "safe and effective"
I found this via "Uncutnews" from Switzerland today (they translated it into german)
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/six-recent-covid-deaths-per-the-milwaukee/comments?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=363080&post_id=75302663&isFreemail=false&utm_medium=email
"Six recent “Covid” deaths, per the Milwaukee coroner’s office"
Please take a good look at the 100% "Covid" deaths. It is that way since the fraud started and they still keep going with it.
You won't find a conscience in those with power "surely someone is going to locate a conscience and break ranks?". Sorry Mr. Hudson, it simply is that way. You remember Mr. Snowden? He found his conscience but what did he change? Nothing. Mr. Manning? Nothing. The criminals (politicians, soldiers, agents, ... are still in office or enjoy there pension while Snowden will never see his home again and Manning will most likely die in prison.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-63057872
Don't know if the above link works. If not then look at the BBC website. The heading of the article is "Dying patient should have been seen in person".
26 year old man died when an ear infection turned into a fatal abscess on his brainstem. His GP surgery refused to see him 4 times and even cancelled a blood test in case he had covid.
The BBC don't mind reporting these sort of "tragedies" but won't delve into whether this shows lockdowns and withdrawal of services was a good idea.
It's not investigative journalism because Ofcom told them they weren't to investigate anything to do with the whole pandemic response. So they haven't. Which is depressing. I watched that film about the Washington Post the other day - that's the sort of journalism needed. Sadly, the Post is just as bad as all the others now.
Excellent thanks. Also we mustn't forget that all or nearly all mainstream reporters as well as their bosses will have almost certainly been 'vaccinated' themselves, so a level of denial is probably natural. It'd be one thing for them to report the 'vaccines' are simply ineffective but perhaps another to admit they might cause future harms not yet revealed, meaning those same reporters might be in for a similar fate themselves some time in the future. In that scenario a "head in the sand" attitute is probably understandable in a way, rather than facing up to what might happen over which they have no control