The British public challenge ceding of sovereignty to World Health Organization
The British public challenge ceding of sovereignty to World Health Organization
"An assault on our freedoms" ~ Danny Kruger, MP
On 17 April 2023, a Parliamentary hearing was held in the United Kingdom in response to e-petition 614335, entitled: Do not sign any WHO Pandemic Treaty unless it is approved via public referendum. It is clear from the fact that a total of 156,086 signatures were collected, and that the debate was very well attended, that many have serious concerns about the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO).
WHO is the United Nations agency responsible for global public health. It aims to “lead global efforts to expand universal health coverage and … coordinate the world’s response to health emergencies.” WHO has 194 member states whose responsibilities are outlined in the IHR promulgated in 1969 and amended in 2005. These regulations are not legally binding and serve as guidance rather than enforceable mandates. In the wake of the Covid-19 event, however, this is set to change.
In response to member states calling for more effective global cooperation to protect countries from health emergencies, a new international legally binding instrument is being developed to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. This process was initiated in late 2021 at a Special Session of WHO’s governing body, the World Health Assembly. One aspect of this process is the amendment of the IHR, which will become enforceable under international law. Another aspect is the drafting of a ‘Pandemic Treaty’, known as WHO CA+, which describes financing, governance, and supply network responsibilities in the event of future disease outbreaks and other public health emergencies.
This video below provides clips from the two-and-a-quarter-hour hearing, which illustrate some of the significant arguments made by those supporting the petition.
In summary, concerns raised related to:
A lack of commitment to national sovereignty and the democratic process by the UK Government, resulting in a loss of trust and confidence in the Government
WHO’s increasing tendency to centralise control rather than recognise the value of subsidiarity, debate and local decision-making
Concerns about WHO’s leadership, its influential and conflicted partners, and lack of accountability to member states
The potential negative impacts of WHO becoming an international authority with legal standing
Concerns about WHO’s lack of capacity and unwillingness to reflect on its failures.
Please support our independent insights with a donation. Click here.
We have a huge problem with the issue of a public referendum in South Africa.
The problem is that the so-called and trumpeted "constitution" was written by the very globalist UN/WEF NWO acolytes that want to foist and enforce this treaty on the publics.
We are denied the right to a public referendum as this right has been taken away form the South African citizens. I explain below:
The old fear trick created the term "Apartheid" was the key to lock us into slavery.
The demonised "Apartheid" Government allowed and used a referendum to ask the publics to allow negotiation with the ANC terrorist alliance. The gullible publics were not aware that this was a bait and switch tactic being employed by the hidden hand of the globalists. Most, but not all agreed to this progressive demand of the neocolonialists.
The faked constitution was never ratified and approved by referendum, this should have been done, so much for the rainbow nation and the was farce of a democracy. It's an illusion.
You fell for the lie South Africans, a "Trick", we were deceived. The prerogative of announcing a referendum, now lies illegally in the hand of a Socialist Communist , i.e., the president of the Country elected by the "Party Political Trick" where the winner takes all. An elective dictatorship, no different to the DA's new trick called Moonshot. Wake-up there is no such thing as a democracy.
Democracy is a soft variant of communism, and rarely in the history of ideas has it been taken for anything else.” - Hoppe
Democracy is a control tool that was sold to humanity by a great dynasty a very long time ago. It goes back to monarchy, when monarchy was falling out of favor, they developed democracy to trick the people into thinking that they had a say in who rules them, but always controlling the outcome of the election." Etienne de la Boetie.
The devious hand of democracy is hidden in the mismatch between the constitution and the process of selecting the people who would manage it.
These constitutions are usually drafted with the ideal leadership in mind; hence constitutions generally give unbridled power to the people who would run the government and this is where the discord lies. Instead of ensuring that only ideal persons qualify to occupy the chambers of government, the system is carelessly structured to promote participation or even victory for anyone including the worst amongst us.
The idea that democracy is a decision-making process may be true in theory but in practice it is about the ideals of the French revolution and the overthrow of the supremacy of God and the rule of law especially God’s laws.
We didn't get a democracy. What we got was an organized crime problem. It goes on for decades, if not centuries.
The term inter-generational organized crime is better because that's the most specific description. I don't like "Illuminati," I don't like "Deep State."
The system is run by a mafia type org that controls Government, Media & Academia who support the Elite Oligarchs. It is clear by observing the indisputable results after voting. Think about it please.
Very soon after being elected, governments simply stop being responsive to the people, but become very responsive to the Elite$ who fund them.
We need to stop legitimizing these criminals by voting in the only game in town. The system we have is simply an elective dictatorship, it is not a democracy and is nothing other then the LAW of the colluding corporations and "Party" collusion which is Admiralty Law. The law of corporations and Trade.
We need a peoples Parliament of direct representation and one that is backed by common law and a common law court. Law of the land GOD's Law.
With this system that we can stop these "Treaties" that make us slaves to tyranny.
the WHO must stand accountable for their disastrous covid policy, the infringement on peoples sovereign rights and their inability to independently assess a situation. Their bias and dictatorial grabs have displayed their true intentions of power, corruption and lies. Tedros Adhamon Ghebreyesus and the entire team must stand accountable as proven: https://www.who.int/director-general/who-headquarters-leadership-team